2004
DOI: 10.1130/b25397.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tectonics of Pliocene removal of lithosphere of the Sierra Nevada, California

Abstract: Pliocene (ca. 3.5 Ma) removal of dense eclogitic material under the Sierra Nevada has been proposed from variations in the petrology and geochemistry of Neogene volcanic rocks and their entrained xenoliths from the southern Sierra. The replacement of eclogite by buoyant, warm asthenosphere is consistent with present-day seismologic and magnetotelluric observations made in the southern Sierra. A necessary consequence of replacing eclogite with peridotite is that mean surface elevations and gravitational potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
184
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(128 reference statements)
11
184
2
Order By: Relevance
“…America plate boundary, or due to post-3.5 Ma crustal delamination that led to Sierra Nevada uplift (Jones et al, 2004). In this case, the Hunter Mountain-Panamint Valley fault may have accommodated most of the acceleration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…America plate boundary, or due to post-3.5 Ma crustal delamination that led to Sierra Nevada uplift (Jones et al, 2004). In this case, the Hunter Mountain-Panamint Valley fault may have accommodated most of the acceleration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significant rate differences for different time intervals are possible for individual ECSZ faults. Faults within the ECSZ are constantly evolving, perhaps in response to westward migration of the shear zone (Dokka and Travis, 1990a;Dokka and Travis, 1990b;Stockli et al, 2003;Dixon et al, 1995;Calzia and Ramo, 2000;Jones et al, 2004;McQuarrie and Wernicke, 2005). Figure 1).…”
Section: Geologic Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sites of proposed lower crustal delamination events include the Sierra Nevada in the western USA Jones et al, 2004;Zandt et al, 2004), the Alboran Sea of the western Mediterranean (Lonergan and White, 1997;Platt et al, 2003;BoothRea et al, 2007) and the Altiplano and Puna Plateaus of the Andes (Kay et al, 1994;McQuarrie et al, 2005). In the latter case extreme crustal thickening over the dipping slab resulted in instabilities in the eclogitic lower crust that led to Pliocene continental lithospheric delamination ( Fig.…”
Section: Lower Crustal Delaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…upper mantle, or the introduction of volatiles to the upper mantle [e.g., Bird, 1979;McQuarrie and Chase, 2000;Humphreys et al, 2003]; (2) mid-Tertiary uplift related to the demise of a Laramide flat slab, where buoyancy is added to the upper mantle by mechanical thinning or chemical modification of the lithosphere [Spencer, 1996;Roy et al, 2005]; and (3) late Tertiary "epeirogenic" uplift associated with regional extensional tectonism, either by convective removal of lithosphere or heating from below [e.g., Bird, 1979;Thompson and Zoback, 1979;Humphreys, 1995;Parsons and McCarthy, 1995;Jones et al, 2004;Zandt et al, 2004]. Quantitative constraints on the timing of uplift therefore have the potential to falsify one or more of these hypotheses.…”
Section: Mechanisms Driving Plateau Uplift and Existing Paleoelevatiomentioning
confidence: 99%