We investigated the activities of telavancin and vancomycin against biofilm-producing Staphylococcus and Enterococcus strains. At clinically attainable concentrations, telavancin was active against bacteria embedded in biofilm (minimal biofilm eradication concentration [MBEC], 0.125 to 2 g/ml) and inhibited biofilm formation at concentrations below the MIC. Vancomycin did not demonstrate the same activity (MBEC, >512 g/ml) against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Telavancin may have a unique role in biofilmassociated infections.Staphylococci and enterococci account for a large proportion of hospital-acquired infections, especially among patients with indwelling devices (17). These infections are often caused by biofilm-producing strains which are difficult to eradicate and which may cause bacteremia and metastatic infections (30).Telavancin is a new lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent with a core chemical structure similar to that of vancomycin yet modified to include a lipophilic side chain (15). Telavancin possesses a second mechanism of action that causes rapid depolarization and loss of the functional integrity of the bacterial membrane (1, 12). These two mechanisms of action may be implicated in the lower range of methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) MICs observed with telavancin (MIC range, 0.06 to 1.0 g/ml) compared to vancomycin (MIC range, 0.5 to 2 g/ml) (8, 13).Previous reports have suggested that telavancin is more effective than vancomycin against biofilm-forming S. aureus in a pharmacokinetic filter model (9). We compared telavancin and vancomycin activities by using previously described in vitro biofilm activity assays. The first assay evaluated each agent's activity in a preformed biofilm by using both a modified version and the standard version of the Calgary Biofilm Pin Lid Device (CBPD) (3,14). The second assay evaluated activity in preventing biofilm formation by planktonic isolates (14).( The medium used for biofilm growth was Bacto tryptic soy broth (TSB; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) plus 1% glucose and 2% NaCl (14). All assays were run in quadruplicate, and cultures were incubated at 35°C. Conventional MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined in duplicate by using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (5, 6).We used a modified version of the CBPD to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria embedded in a 24-h biofilm to determine the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) (3). Briefly, a starting inoculum of 7 log 10 CFU/ml was established by the direct colony suspension method from a 24-h tryptic soy agar (TSA; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) plate. This inoculum was then standardized with McFarland standards and validated by determination of viable counts on TSA plates. Biofilms developed on the pin lid (Immuno TSP; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) submerged in the inoculated broth at 35°C for 24 h on a rocking table (Boekel S...