Tele–Mental Health for Reaching Out to Patients in a Time of Pandemic: Provider Survey and Meta-analysis of Patient Satisfaction

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic threatened to impact mental health by disrupting access to care due to physical distance measures and the unexpected pressure on public health services. Tele–mental health was rapidly implemented to deliver health care services. Objective The aims of this study were (1) to present state-of-the-art tele–mental health research, (2) to survey mental health providers about care delivery during the pandemic, and (3) to assess patient satisfaction with tele–mental health. Methods Document clustering was applied to map research topics within tele–mental health research. A survey was circulated among mental health providers. Patient satisfaction was investigated through a meta-analysis of studies that compared satisfaction scores between tele–mental health and face-to-face interventions for mental health disorders, retrieved from Web of Knowledge and Scopus. Hedges g was used as the effect size measure, and effect sizes were pooled using a random-effect model. Sources of heterogeneity and bias were examined. Results Evidence on tele–mental health has been accumulating since 2000, especially regarding service implementation, depressive or anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, and special populations. Research was concentrated in a few countries. The survey (n=174 respondents from Italy, n=120 international) confirmed that, after the onset of COVID-19 outbreak, there was a massive shift from face-to-face to tele–mental health delivery of care. However, respondents held skeptical views about tele–mental health and did not feel sufficiently trained and satisfied. Meta-analysis of 29 studies (n=2143) showed that patients would be equally satisfied with tele–mental health as they are with face-to-face interventions (Hedges g=−0.001, 95% CI −0.116 to 0.114, P=.98, Q=43.83, I2=36%, P=.03) if technology-related issues were minimized. Conclusions Mental health services equipped with tele–mental health will be better able to cope with public health crises. Both providers and patients need to be actively engaged in digitization, to reshape their reciprocal trust around technological innovations.

Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Supply in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

“…Our data confirm the need to screen for mental disorders to facilitate psychological treatment (potentially in form of telehealth or digital health advises) to limit anxiety and depression levels, probably leading to less canceled medical appointments and an improved medical treatment ( 45 ).…”

“…As outlined, ACHD patients with insufficient medical routine examinations and postponed medical appointments tend to have a higher morbidity and mortality ( 25 ). Therefore, as proposed in other chronic diseases, identification and treatment of mental health comorbidities, recommendation of remote healthcare support and the encouragement to keep the follow-ups on a regular basis may help to avoid adverse health consequences ( 45 ).…”

Reshaping mental health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: service response and telepsychiatry in a catchment area of 10 million people

“…However, skeptical views and insecurity due to lack of training have also been reported in Italy [28]. The major challenge faced by the Italian mental health system is a low government expenditure on mental health, re ected in fewer human resources than in other high-income countries [29].…”

IT and the Quality and Efficiency of Mental Health Care in a Time of COVID-19: Case Study of Mental Health Providers in England

“…Research has highlighted the unprecedented use of remote (digital and telephone) consultations in mental health care during the pandemic [1,4,5,[9][10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The greatest benefit was that it enabled providers to respond flexibly to the needs of service users while adjusting to pandemic-enforced challenges and restrictions.…”