“…9,11,26 Synchronous telepractice, where commonly a live, videoconferencing link is utilized to provide direct specialist clinical services in real time to patients living in nonmetropolitan areas, is evolving as an accepted and viable solution to improve access to healthcare while avoiding unnecessary patient/clinician travel and costs. 1,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Although more commonly used in other oncology services, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] to date, synchronous telepractice has been used in head and neck cancer management to support multidisciplinary team meetings, 1,28,31,33 perform patient screening, [42][43][44] and facilitate select clinical assessments, such as fiberoptic nasendoscopy 29,30,35,45 and conduct medical reviews. 1 Although the viability of these services has been documented, few have reported on economic outcomes.…”