2014
DOI: 10.1177/1932296813519311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telehealth Remote Monitoring Systematic Review

Abstract: Approximately 26 million Americans have diabetes. When uncontrolled, diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death and the leading cause of kidney failure, blindness, and nontraumatic amputations in the United States. 1 Researchers have found a decrease in complications and improved quality of life when persons with type 2 diabetes achieve national diabetes outcomes targets for blood glucose, blood pressure, and blood fats. 2 Identifying evidence-based solutions to improve outcomes in this population is criti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
56
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tele-health remote monitoring interventions that incorporate multiple elements of structured self-monitoring of BG have been shown to be the most effective in achieving A1C level reduction. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tele-health remote monitoring interventions that incorporate multiple elements of structured self-monitoring of BG have been shown to be the most effective in achieving A1C level reduction. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several diabetes reviews included elements of remote clinical review, with some reporting positive outcomes [27,30,40]. In asthma and COPD, the findings were typically neutral [27,67].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only review to address explicitly the question of which components were associated with improved disease outcomes was Greenwood et al, weighted 2 stars [30]. They defined 7 separate components of telehealth (patient education, health care provider education, self-monitoring profile, blood glucose goals, use of blood glucose data to modify behavior, feedback to patients, and 2-way interaction).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline HbA 1c levels in the reviewed studies ranged from near normal (6.5%) to extremely elevated (9.8%), which is similar to the results of our study. In one review from Greenwood et al (28), it was noted, unsurprisingly, that when study participants’ mean baseline HbA 1c level was at or close to goal, a small intervention effect was seen. The relationship of the baseline HbA 1c level to the intervention effect demonstrates the importance of choosing the optimal population for interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%