2015
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2015270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telemetry Monitoring: Are Admission Criteria Based on Evidence?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For GI bleeding, telemetry does not decrease re‐bleeding, length of stay, or 30‐day mortality rates . Similarly, hemodynamically stable patients with PE on anticoagulation likely do not require telemetry monitoring . For septic patients, the role of telemetry is unclear since those most at risk for new‐onset atrial fibrillation were admitted to the ICU with acute organ dysfunction or mechanical ventilation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GI bleeding, telemetry does not decrease re‐bleeding, length of stay, or 30‐day mortality rates . Similarly, hemodynamically stable patients with PE on anticoagulation likely do not require telemetry monitoring . For septic patients, the role of telemetry is unclear since those most at risk for new‐onset atrial fibrillation were admitted to the ICU with acute organ dysfunction or mechanical ventilation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%