Teleoperated assembly of a micro‐lens system by means of a micro‐manipulation workstation

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of the research is to perform an accurate micromanipulation task, the assembly of a lens system, implementing safe procedures in a flexible microrobot‐based workstation for micromanipulation.Design/methodology/approachThe approach to the micromanipulation research issue consists in designing and building a micromanipulation station based on mobile microrobots, with 5 degrees of freedom and a size of a few cm3, capable of moving and manipulating by the use of tube‐shaped and multilayered piezo‐actuators. Controlled by visual and force/tactile sensor information, the micro‐robot is able to perform manipulation with a motion resolution down to 10 nm in a telemanipulated or semi‐automated mode, thus freeing human operators from the difficult task of handling minuscule objects directly. Equipped with purposely‐developed grippers, the robot can take over high‐precise grasping, transport, manipulation and positioning of mechanical or biological micro‐objects. A computer system using PC‐compatible hardware components ensures the robot operation in real‐time.FindingsThe robots and the grippers described in this paper are highly interesting tools. Even if each specific application may require specific modifications, the proposed solution is extremely versatile, due to the ability to manipulate with a very large stroke (being the size of the base the robot works on) with a very high motion resolution. These positive aspects do make the robots very suitable also for working in a scanning electron microscope, for wafer inspection in a laboratory, and so on.Research limitations/implicationsFuture work will include modifications to the existing system in order to enhance the flexibility of the workstation: e.g. other robots and other tools with different characteristics will be designed and fabricated. Research efforts will be devoted in particular to further miniaturization of the actuators.Practical implicationsThis workstation can be used as a platform for assembling novel prototypes, and as a test bench for testing new assembly procedures or new products, e.g. the lens assembly procedure described in this work, even if not suitable for mass production, was useful to assess the performance of the two‐lenses assembly system itself, compared to standard systems with just one lens.Originality/valueThe system proves that the development of mobile micro‐robots is a promising approach to realise very small and flexible tools useful for different applications. By means of its intuitive teleoperation mode, the system enables the user to work in the micro‐world; due to the force feedback the user is almost immersed into the micro‐world and gets a sense for the handled object.

Improving Human-Machine Interaction for a Powered Wheelchair Driver by Using Variable-Switches and Sensors that Reduce Wheelchair-Veer

“…If a person cannot manage fine hand movements with a joystick they might be able to use other parts of their body to provide an input, for example head [29], , foot [30] tongue [31]. Human computer interaction was considered by Begasa-Suso [32,33] and Sanders [34] and Eisinberg [35] described force sensing but, in real situations, simple binary switches have usually been used [7].…”

Simple expert systems to improve an ultrasonic sensor‐system for a tele‐operated mobile‐robot

“…Much research has aimed to improve tele-operation and robotics in hazardous or unpleasant environments 2,[9][10][11][12][26][27][28][29]53 , or in places where conventional techniques required cost intensive supporting infrastructures [54][55][56] . Conventional robots are limited when a task requires a level of perception and decision making which cannot be met in a cost effective or robust way.…”

Comparing ability to complete simple tele‐operated rescue or maintenance mobile‐robot tasks with and without a sensor system

“…Much research has aimed to improve tele-operation and robotics for inspection and maintenance in hazardous or unpleasant environments [18], or in places where conventional techniques require cost intensive supporting infrastructures [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”