Telephone-Administered Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Risky Sexual Behavior in HIV-Infected Rural Persons: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Coghill, David; Heckman, Timothy G.; Anderson, Timothy; Heckman, Bernadette Davantes; Garske, John P.; McCarthy, John

doi:10.1097/olq.0b013e3181c18975

Cited by 31 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We obtained and read the full text for 21 studies. Three of the full texts (Cosio, 2008;Mausbach, Semple, Strathdee, Zians, & Patterson, 2007;van Kesteren, Kok, van Brukelen, & Kok, 2007) did not contain sufficient information for us to determine whether the studies met the inclusion criteria and we therefore contacted the studies' corresponding authors. All authors contacted provided information that allowed us to determine eligibility.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The overall estimated odds ratio for HIV infection was 0.84 (95% CI = 0.66, 1.08) or 15.7% (adjusted for baseline covariates) lower in the intervention group than the control group, but at none of the eight follow-up times (up to 48 months postbaseline) was the difference statistically significant. Self-reported, not statistically significant, positive test for STI was reported in Cosio (2008). Meta-analyses were not computed for STI/HIV acquisition.…”

Section: Results Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies (Cosio, 2008;Picciano et al, 2001) reported data on motivation for change. Results from the Motivation to Perform AIDS Preventive Behavior Questionnaire showed effect at study level, favoring the control group (MD = -10.80, 95% CI = -12.44, -9.16) in Cosio's study (2008).…”

Section: Motivation For Changementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, the 10 studies included 6,051 participants (mean = 605, range = 79-4,295). All participants were MSM, except 35 participants in Cosio's (2008) study, but there were no significant differences between the MSM subset and the total study sample (D. Cosio, personal communication, July 13, 2009). Across the six studies reporting sexual identification, 82.2% of the participants considered themselves gay.…”

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 10 RCTs included, one was cluster randomized (van Kesteren et al, 2007). One trial was an unpublished report (van Kesteren et al, 2007), one was a dissertation (Cosio, 2008), and the remaining 8 studies were published in peer-reviewed journals, all within the last decade (Table 1). Nine studies investigated the effectiveness of MI on sexual risk behaviors, three its effectiveness on both sexual-and AOD-related behaviors, and one the effectiveness on HIV testing.…”

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Effectiveness of MI4MSM: How Useful is Motivational Interviewing as an HIV Risk Prevention Program for Men who have Sex with Men? A Systematic Review

Berg¹,

Ross²,

Tikkanen³

2011

AIDS Education and Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Among men who have sex with men (MSM), the principal risk practice for HIV infection is unprotected anal intercourse, often engaged in under the influence of alcohol and other substances. Both behaviors are targeted through the much-used counseling approach motivational interviewing (MI). We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of behavioral interventions adapting the principles and techniques of MI on HIV risk behaviors for MSM. Ten randomized controlled trials, which included 6,051 participants at baseline, were eligible for inclusion. Nine outcomes, of which seven were for sexual behavior outcomes, were sufficiently similar to compute meta-analyses. With the exception of one outcome, drinks per day at short-term follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups receiving MI and the control groups. The effectiveness of MI as a prevention strategy for HIV risk behaviors among MSM is uncertain and continued work to craft more effective HIV prevention programming for this group should be done.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results Of Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivation For Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Effectiveness of MI4MSM: How Useful is Motivational Interviewing as an HIV Risk Prevention Program for Men who have Sex with Men? A Systematic Review

Berg¹,

Ross²,

Tikkanen³

2011

AIDS Education and Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Telephone-Administered Motivational Interviewing Reduces Risky Sexual Behavior in HIV-Positive Late Middle-Age and Older Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

et al. 2011

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By 2014, 50% of all adults living with HIV/AIDS will be 50-plus years of age. This pilot randomized controlled trial assessed the efficacy of two telephone-delivered motivational interviewing (MI) interventions to reduce risky sexual behavior in HIV-infected adults 45-plus years old. Eligible participants reported engaging in at least one occasion of unprotected anal and/or vaginal intercourse in the 3 months prior to study enrollment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive four sessions of telephone-delivered MI, one session of telephone-delivered MI, or no MI. Relative to 4-session MI participants, Controls reported approximately three times as many episodes of unprotected sex at 3- and 6-month follow-up, while 1-session MI participants reported four times as many unprotected sex acts at 3- and 6-month follow-up. No differences in condom use were observed between 1-session MI and Control participants. Additional large-scale studies that evaluate this intervention approach are warranted.

show abstract

A Systematic Review to Identify Challenges of Demonstrating Efficacy of HIV Behavioral Interventions for Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV but few MSM-specific evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have been identified for this vulnerable group. We conducted a systematic review to identify reasons for the small number of EBIs for MSM. We also compared study, intervention and sample characteristics of EBIs versus non-EBIs to better understand the challenges of demonstrating efficacy evidence. Thirty-three MSM-specific studies were evaluated: Nine (27 %) were considered EBIs while 24 (73 %) were non-EBIs. Non-EBIs had multiple methodological limitations; the most common was not finding a significant positive effect. Compared to EBIs, non-EBIs were less likely to use peer intervention deliverers, include sexual communication in their interventions, and intervene at the community level. Incorporating characteristics associated with EBIs may strengthen behavioral interventions for MSM. More EBIs are needed for substance-using MSM, MSM of color, MSM residing in the south and MSM in couples.

show abstract

Telephone-Administered Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Risky Sexual Behavior in HIV-Infected Rural Persons: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: Brief telephone-administered interventions that integrate motivational interviewing with skills-building show potential to reduce risky sexual behaviors in HIV-infected rural persons. Additional and large-scale evaluations of this intervention approach appear warranted.

Cited by 31 publications

References 14 publications

The Effectiveness of MI4MSM: How Useful is Motivational Interviewing as an HIV Risk Prevention Program for Men who have Sex with Men? A Systematic Review

The Effectiveness of MI4MSM: How Useful is Motivational Interviewing as an HIV Risk Prevention Program for Men who have Sex with Men? A Systematic Review

Telephone-Administered Motivational Interviewing Reduces Risky Sexual Behavior in HIV-Positive Late Middle-Age and Older Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

A Systematic Review to Identify Challenges of Demonstrating Efficacy of HIV Behavioral Interventions for Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About