1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(21)00715-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telephone surveys as a method for obtaining dietary information: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While face-to-face interviews are generally more costly than self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews. 17,18 response rates for face-to-face interviews were considered superior to the other two modes. 17,19 Except for surveys which ask sensitive questions, response rates for self-administered questionnaires and phone interviews are often comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While face-to-face interviews are generally more costly than self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews. 17,18 response rates for face-to-face interviews were considered superior to the other two modes. 17,19 Except for surveys which ask sensitive questions, response rates for self-administered questionnaires and phone interviews are often comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the mode of data collection depends upon a number of factors including the data that are actually required, cost implications, amount of time available and any data validation requirements. In addition, the mode of data collection will have a direct effect upon the response rate for the study where subjects are being approached to participate, with postal questionnaires tending to have lower response rates, from around 50% to 80% (Cartwright, 1988), (McHorney et al 1994), (Mickey et al 1994), (Fox et al 1992), (Brambilla and McKinlay, 1987), (O'Toole et al 1986), (Siemiatycki, 1979) and face-to-face interviews optimising response rates to in excess of 95% (Donovan et al 1997), (Cartwright, 1988), (McHorney et al 1994), (Mickey et al 1994), (Fox et al 1992), (Brambilla and McKinlay, 1987), (O'Toole et al 1986), (Siemiatycki, 1979), (Draper et al 1999). As reported in section 2.4.2 on information bias, data may be collected from different sources for validation purposes, for example, to use data from medical notes to validate data collected at face-to-face interviews.…”
Section: Standardisation Of Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach possessed a high potential to improve nutrition consequences (4) and to assisted reducing disease transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic (5). The advantages were also cost-effectiveness of interview approach for assessing usual dietary intakes and the capability of gathering data from a large number of individuals in geographic areas with widely scattered populations (6,7). Therefore, telenutrition can be a gadget to detect nutritional status during outbreak of coronavirus disease (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%