Telerehabilitation perceptions and experiences of physiatrists in a lower‐middle‐income country during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract

Background The COVID‐19 pandemic catalyzed the adoption of telerehabilitation in various health care settings. However, there was neither a preexisting national guideline in the Philippines nor an internationally agreed upon standard for telerehabilitation. The literature lacks nationwide studies documenting how physiatrists perceived and experienced telerehabilitation during the pandemic. Objective To determine the perceptions and experiences of physiatrists in the Philippines regarding telerehabilitation. Design Online survey originally developed by the authors with inputs from local experts in telehealth or telerehabilitation. Setting Nationwide, involving board‐certified physiatrists practicing in the Philippines. Participants Fellows of the Philippine Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (PARM) (N = 259) with Internet access. Main Outcome Measures Self‐reported telerehabilitation knowledge, skills, and experience; key concerns; preferred clients, service offerings, and methods (technology, duration, charging). Results The respondents (n = 161; 62.2% response rate) had a mean age of 48.1 ± 9.6 years, were mostly female (57.8%), and mostly practiced in private hospitals and urban settings. The majority reported inadequate telerehabilitation knowledge (61.5%), skills (58.4%), and experience (72.1%). The most common sources of telerehabilitation knowledge were colleagues (52.8%), PARM (51.6%), and telemedicine‐related websites (41.6%). Most of the respondents preferred to conduct telerehabilitation with former patients over new ones and prescribe telerehabilitation programs for physical, occupational, psychological, and speech‐language therapy but not for swallowing therapy. Videoconferencing was the most common telerehabilitation method. More than half of the respondents charged lesser fees for telerehabilitation compared to in‐person consultations. Although the majority recognized the need for telerehabilitation, their key concerns included the lack of thorough patient examination and medicolegal liability issues. Conclusion Despite their limited baseline knowledge, skills, and experience regarding telerehabilitation, many physiatrists in the Philippines learned to adopt this service delivery method during the pandemic. Their perceptions and experiences could be used in formulating practice‐based guidelines and strategies to improve the conduct of telerehabilitation in the country.

Effect of telemonitoring and telerehabilitation on physical activity, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and healthcare use in patients with chronic lung diseases or COVID-19: A scoping review

“…This knowledge is needed among the first priorities identified by the patients and clinicians after COVID-19 widely affected the delivery of rehabilitation services. 92 , 93 63.6% of the retrieved manuscript reported on randomized controlled trials demonstrating the current need for evidence about the effectiveness of telemonitoring and telerehabilitation in patients with chronic lung diseases or COVID-19. This paper presented the evidence available as of June 2021.…”

Case Report: Rehabilitation for Lower Extremity Pain Due to Venous Stasis in a Patient With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

“…Several studies have reported rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia ( 14 – 18 ). However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of rehabilitation for patients with MIS-C.…”

Readiness and Acceptance of Philippine General Hospital Medical Staff for Telemedicine as Alternative Method of Patient Consultation during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-enhanced Community Quarantine Period

“…This paradigm shift may even continue beyond the pandemic period after the telemedicine stakeholders (consumers and providers) have begun to realize the benefits of virtual care and how to mitigate its inherent limitations and risks (e.g., data privacy issues, technical difficulties, challenges in virtual examination). 14,17 To sustain eHealth in the country, the National Telehealth Center (NTTC) of the Philippines as the lead government agency, will need to push for the institutionalization of an eHealth structure and eHealth system. 18 However, similar to other resource-limited countries, even after almost two years into the pandemic, telemedicine is still poorly integrated with the Philippines' health care and educational system due to various challenges.…”