1998
DOI: 10.1029/98jb02236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teleseismic estimates of radiated seismic energy: The E/M0 discriminant for tsunami earthquakes

Abstract: Abstract. We adapt the formalism of Boatwright and Choy for the computation of radiated seismic energy from broadband records at teleseismic distances to the real-time situation when neither the depth nor the focal geometry of the source is known accurately. The analysis of a large data set of more than 500 records from 52 large, recent earthquakes shows that this procedure yields values of the estimated energy, E oe, in good agreement with values computed from available source parameters, for example as publi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
237
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
14
237
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] This study is built upon the methods described by Boatwright and Choy [1986] and Newman and Okal [1998], but utilizes advancements in computational code for more rapid and automated processing, and it is benefited by the vast improvement in the readily available broadband seismic data from globally distributed stations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[5] This study is built upon the methods described by Boatwright and Choy [1986] and Newman and Okal [1998], but utilizes advancements in computational code for more rapid and automated processing, and it is benefited by the vast improvement in the readily available broadband seismic data from globally distributed stations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain consistency with the previous catalog of Newman and Okal [1998], we limit the frequency range to between 14 mHz and 2 Hz (period range between 0.5 and 70 s). At frequencies above 2 Hz much of the signal falls below background noise levels, particularly for smaller events [e.g., Choy and Boatwright, 1995;Newman and Okal, 1998;Vassilou and Kanamori, 1982]. The lower frequency limit of 14 mHz is chosen because it corresponds to the time window of evaluation (70 s) of Newman and Okal [1998], and is maintained for catalog comparisons.…”
Section: Energy Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations