1986
DOI: 10.1080/08838158609386615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Television and the erosion of regional diversity

Abstract: The relationship between heavy television viewing and the reduction in the diversity of traditional regional cultures in the United States was investigated by secondary analysis of six General Social Surveys conducted by the National Opinion Research Center between 1975 and1983. On a variety of political and social attitudes and opinions, the outlooks of heavy viewers from different geographic regions tended to be more homogeneous compared to those who watched less television. Historically, the United States … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the reason for a lack of focus on moderating effects such as mainstreaming and resonance may have to do with their relegation to secondary status, as discussed earlier. That is, it is possible that mainstreaming may occur under certain conditions (e.g., for particular dependent variables, such as political orientations and beliefs; Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1982, 1984Morgan, 1986) but that resonance may be observed under other conditions (e.g., when dependent variables involve fear, probability, or perceived risk of crime victimization; see Doob & Macdonald, 1979;Morgan, 1986; as well as the results of this study). For example, the two moderating effects, in conjunction with a main cultivation effect, have been accused of effectively making cultivation theory nonfalsifiable (Hirsch, 1981b).…”
Section: Importance Of Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Part of the reason for a lack of focus on moderating effects such as mainstreaming and resonance may have to do with their relegation to secondary status, as discussed earlier. That is, it is possible that mainstreaming may occur under certain conditions (e.g., for particular dependent variables, such as political orientations and beliefs; Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Signorielli, 1982, 1984Morgan, 1986) but that resonance may be observed under other conditions (e.g., when dependent variables involve fear, probability, or perceived risk of crime victimization; see Doob & Macdonald, 1979;Morgan, 1986; as well as the results of this study). For example, the two moderating effects, in conjunction with a main cultivation effect, have been accused of effectively making cultivation theory nonfalsifiable (Hirsch, 1981b).…”
Section: Importance Of Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…'' This open-ended question was used in previous cultivation studies to measure total viewing (Carveth & Alexander, 1985;Gerbner et al, 1978;Morgan, 1983Morgan, , 1984Morgan, , 1986O'Keefe, 1984;Signorielli, 1990;Tan, 1982;Volgy & Schwarz, 1980). We also asked about daily viewing of dramatic series and news programs as these shows achieve high ratings in the country where the study took place (Israel Audience Research Board, 2004), and-probably in light of their content-produce significant cultivation effects in violence and crime (Cohen & Weimann, 2000;Romer, Jamieson, & Aday, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerbner et al, 1982;Morgan, 1986), alienation (e.g. Morgan, 1986), prevalence of violence (Gerbner, 1977;Gerbner and Gross, 1976), and gender stereotypes (Gross and Jeffries-Fox, 1978). Rubin et al (1988) found that the effects of television viewing on perception of social reality were program specific.…”
Section: Cultivation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%