1998
DOI: 10.1109/jproc.1998.664284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Television: Past, Present, And Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In general, TV broadcasters choose interlaced scanning as the main standard for video formats. 16 Since it alternately scans two fields by dividing a frame into two parts, interlacing may cause video quality degradation such as flickering. Because many devices such as DTV, UDTV, or other monitors use progressive scanning, the deinterlacing problem has become serious because it converts interlaced scanned videos into progressive scanned videos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In general, TV broadcasters choose interlaced scanning as the main standard for video formats. 16 Since it alternately scans two fields by dividing a frame into two parts, interlacing may cause video quality degradation such as flickering. Because many devices such as DTV, UDTV, or other monitors use progressive scanning, the deinterlacing problem has become serious because it converts interlaced scanned videos into progressive scanned videos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional television systems adopted the interlaced format in order to save bandwidth [1]. However, interlaced scanning has many artifacts such as interline flicker, inter-field flicker, twitter, and serration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%