2018
DOI: 10.1553/aeundl28s309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tell el-Dabca and Byblos: New Chronological Evidence

Abstract: aimed to synchronise major excavation sites along the Levantine coast with the relative chronology of Tell el-Dab c a. Research was done in the frame of nise newly excavated sites with Tell el-Dab c promising museum material from old excavations was one of the most important trading partners for Tell el-Dab c synchronise their material with the stratigraphy of Tell el-Dab c a. Since their discovery in the early enced by the appearance of Egyptian prestige with the tombs I and II being contemporaneous th and II… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Egyptian materials in Byblos, Ebla, and Kerma seem to predate their chronological context (caution in Ben Tor forthcoming a and b). For instance, in royal tombs at Byblos, the diagnostic prestige goods of Egyptian manufacture or inspiration stylistically and typologically date back to the mid-MB I (late Middle Kingdom) (Kopetzky 2018), particularly to the reigns of Amenemhat III and IV. The pottery corpus, on the other hand, dates to the MB II-mid MB III, suggesting that two chronological distinct groups of objects can be envisaged in a single assemblage.…”
Section: 'Out-of-time' Artefacts: Chronological Asynchronismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Egyptian materials in Byblos, Ebla, and Kerma seem to predate their chronological context (caution in Ben Tor forthcoming a and b). For instance, in royal tombs at Byblos, the diagnostic prestige goods of Egyptian manufacture or inspiration stylistically and typologically date back to the mid-MB I (late Middle Kingdom) (Kopetzky 2018), particularly to the reigns of Amenemhat III and IV. The pottery corpus, on the other hand, dates to the MB II-mid MB III, suggesting that two chronological distinct groups of objects can be envisaged in a single assemblage.…”
Section: 'Out-of-time' Artefacts: Chronological Asynchronismmentioning
confidence: 99%