2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2006.05.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tellurated heterocycles, 2-[(2-thienyltelluro)methyl]tetrahydrofuran (L1) and [(2-thienyltelluro)methyl]tetrahydro-2H-pyran (L2): Synthesis and complexation reactions with Pd(II), Pt(II), Hg(II), Ru(II) and Cu(I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the cation of 4 , the Ru–Cl bond length [2.413(3) Å] is consistent with those of 1 and 3 . The Ru–Cl bond length of the cation of 6 [2.4078(14) Å] is consistent with those in earlier reports of 2.415(2)/2.422(2) Å for dichloro(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene){bis[2‐(2‐thienyl)ethyl] telluride}ruthenium(II)39 and 2.417(2)–2.436(2) Å for [RuCl 2 (η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)L] (L = monodentate Te ligand)4446 and [RuCl{η 2 ‐C,N‐C 6 H 3 (CH 2 NMe 2 ) 2 ‐2,6}{η 6 ‐C 10 H 14 }] 47. It is somewhat longer than the value 2.308(2) Å reported for[(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)RuCl(H 2 NCH 2 CH 2 TeC 6 H 4 OMe)]Cl · H 2 O,38but the difference with the values for 1 , 3 , and 4 are not very significant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For the cation of 4 , the Ru–Cl bond length [2.413(3) Å] is consistent with those of 1 and 3 . The Ru–Cl bond length of the cation of 6 [2.4078(14) Å] is consistent with those in earlier reports of 2.415(2)/2.422(2) Å for dichloro(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene){bis[2‐(2‐thienyl)ethyl] telluride}ruthenium(II)39 and 2.417(2)–2.436(2) Å for [RuCl 2 (η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)L] (L = monodentate Te ligand)4446 and [RuCl{η 2 ‐C,N‐C 6 H 3 (CH 2 NMe 2 ) 2 ‐2,6}{η 6 ‐C 10 H 14 }] 47. It is somewhat longer than the value 2.308(2) Å reported for[(η 6 ‐ p ‐cymene)RuCl(H 2 NCH 2 CH 2 TeC 6 H 4 OMe)]Cl · H 2 O,38but the difference with the values for 1 , 3 , and 4 are not very significant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, Ru-Cl bond distance of the cation of 4 is somewhat longer than 2.308 (2) [46]. The Ru-C bond distances 2.170(10)À2.231(10) Å and C-Ru-C bond angles of the cation of 4 are consistent with earlier reports on species having Ru(p-cymene) unit [52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. The bond angles at the coordinating Te and N atoms are as expected for nearly trigonal-pyramidal and tetrahedral geometries, respectively.…”
Section: Crystal Structuressupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The Ru-N bond length (2.085(7) Å) is consistent with the sum of covalent radii ca. (19) Å for Ru(II)(g 6 -benzene)-complexes of bis(pyrazol-1-yl)pyridazine and Ru(II)(g 6 -p-cymene)-complexes of 3,6-bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)pyridazine [48] [RuCl 2 (p-cymene)L] (L = monodentate Te-ligand) [56][57][58] and [RuCl{g 2 -C,N-C 6 H 3 (CH 2 NMe 2 ) 2 -2,6}{g 6 -C 10 H 14 }] [59]. However, Ru-Cl bond distance of the cation of 4 is somewhat longer than 2.308 (2) [46].…”
Section: Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive chemistry of such compounds is known [3]. Numerous half-sandwich complexes of (h 6 -arene)Ru(II) unit with hybrid organochalcogen ligands (having N and/or O as other donor atoms) behaving as monodentate [4,5], bidentate [6e9] and tridentate [10e13], have been reported in last decade. Half-sandwich complexes of Ru(III) are generally formed by (h 5 -Cp/Cp*)Ru(III) unit and most of them are binuclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%