2008
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2007.083352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telomerase activity in transthoracic fine needle biopsy aspirates as a marker of peripheral lung cancer

Abstract: Background: A study was undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of telomerase activity assay in transthoracic fine needle biopsy (TFNB) aspirates collected from peripheral tumours of the lung in predicting the malignant aetiology of lung infiltrations. Methods: 100 patients with a peripheral infiltration of the lung underwent TFNB of the focal lesion. The aspirates were subjected to standard cytological evaluation. Telomerase activity in the specimens was determined with the PCR-ELISA PLUS method. The sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the TRAP-PAGE or TRAP-ELISA assay with the CX or ACX reverse primer, telomerase activity was reported 70-73% in bronchial lavage, 75% in transthoracic fine needle biopsy aspirates and 82.5% in pleural effusions of malignant patients whereas 6.25-19.3% false positivity in benign samples. [16][17][18][19][20][21] Since our modified TRAP assay could ignore the inference on telomerase activity from hundred-fold somatic cells, frozen tissues were directly grinded and extracted for telomerase with no necessity of cancer cell capture techniques, such as microdissection. Among sixty lung carcinoma cases, the realtime PCR TRAP demonstrated a positive telomerase activity in 51 samples (85%), in contrast to 47 (78%) cases by TRAP-PAGE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the TRAP-PAGE or TRAP-ELISA assay with the CX or ACX reverse primer, telomerase activity was reported 70-73% in bronchial lavage, 75% in transthoracic fine needle biopsy aspirates and 82.5% in pleural effusions of malignant patients whereas 6.25-19.3% false positivity in benign samples. [16][17][18][19][20][21] Since our modified TRAP assay could ignore the inference on telomerase activity from hundred-fold somatic cells, frozen tissues were directly grinded and extracted for telomerase with no necessity of cancer cell capture techniques, such as microdissection. Among sixty lung carcinoma cases, the realtime PCR TRAP demonstrated a positive telomerase activity in 51 samples (85%), in contrast to 47 (78%) cases by TRAP-PAGE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, telomerase activity assessment in cytological specimens has been used in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign focal lesions of the lung. Using the TRAP‐PAGE or TRAP‐ELISA assay with the CX or ACX reverse primer, telomerase activity was reported 70–73% in bronchial lavage, 75% in transthoracic fine needle biopsy aspirates and 82.5% in pleural effusions of malignant patients whereas 6.25–19.3% false positivity in benign samples 16–21 . Since our modified TRAP assay could ignore the inference on telomerase activity from hundred‐fold somatic cells, frozen tissues were directly grinded and extracted for telomerase with no necessity of cancer cell capture techniques, such as microdissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,22 In our previous studies we proved that assessment of telomerase activity in lung infiltrations is a useful supplemental procedure in differentiation between malignant and benign tumours. 23 It is thought then that telomerase, as an enzyme responsible for unlimited replication of genetic material inside cancer cells and incomplete cell divisions, could be a molecular prognostic factor. Fujita et al 24 observed that strong and moderate expression of human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA (hTERT) in resected NSCLC was a prognostic factor of survival with predictive power similar to that of lymph node status, pathomorphological TNM stage and the age of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various adjuvant methods have been proposed, including determining specific tumor markers (4), protein telomerase (5) and chromosome analysis (6). However, there are no currently reliable and effective molecular biomarkers used in diagnosing and predicting outcome for cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%