“…Although some histopathological features have been suggested to be associated with an increased incidence of malignancy, including tumor necrosis, mitosis rate >3/30 HPF, capsular invasion, vascular invasion, large nests with central degeneration, a lack of hyaline globules, a high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, monotony of cytological pattern, and spindle cell patterns [6,17,19], none of these differences is sufficiently diagnostic. Moreover, molecular markers, including telomerase [20], inhibins, activins [21], endothelial Per-ARNT-Sim domain protein-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, endothelin receptor type B [22], and cyclooxygenase [21], have been found to be significant but unreliable and not readily applicable for distinguishing benign from malignant pheochromocytomas. Moreover, in assaying clinical parameters, we found that age, gender, symptoms, and delay in diagnosis did not correlate with the presence of either benign or malignant pheochromocytoma.…”