1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(96)00107-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEM imaging and evalution of magnetic structures in Co/Cu multilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The circle pattern observed for t Ir ϭ0.5 nm suggests that in this strongly AF coupled multilayer 360°domain walls exist and that these domain walls lie one on top of the other, as discussed in Ref. 21. The MFM image obtained from the thinnest multilayer reveals a weak line pattern with a linewidth of about 0.3 m and a distance of 2-5 m, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The circle pattern observed for t Ir ϭ0.5 nm suggests that in this strongly AF coupled multilayer 360°domain walls exist and that these domain walls lie one on top of the other, as discussed in Ref. 21. The MFM image obtained from the thinnest multilayer reveals a weak line pattern with a linewidth of about 0.3 m and a distance of 2-5 m, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For magnetoelectronic and spintronic device applications, the domain state and switching behavior of various vertically and laterally structured magnetic systems requires detailed investigations in the space and time domain. The experimental techniques available for domain imaging provide either real space information, such as magnetic force microscopy (MFM) [1,2], Kerr microscopy (KM) [3], Lorentz microscopy (LM) [4,5,6], polarized electron emission microscopy (PEEM) [7,8], and secondary electron microscopy with polarization analysis (SEMPA) [9], or reciprocal space information, such as resonant soft xray magnetic small-angle scattering (SAS) [10]. In any case, magnetic domain information is obtained via magnetic stray fields emanating from the sample (MFM) or via the local magnetic polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both fields, differential phase contrast (DPC) experiments 6 7 8 are considered as a key for the understanding of tunnelling electroresistance 9 and the quantum-confined Stark effect 10 , respectively. On the basis of its success in the quantification of magnetic fields 11 12 13 varying on the micrometre scale, conventional DPC is predicted to be able to map atomic electric fields at the picometre scale by aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and prospects to detect electron redistributions due to chemical bonding have been given 6 . Recently, impressive DPC experiments have been performed in which signatures of atomic electric fields, including ionicity, have been observed 8 by recording portions of diffraction patterns on a segmented annular bright-field detector 14 15 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%