2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TEM observation of the growth process of helium nanobubbles on tungsten: Nanostructure formation mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

26
164
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
26
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This layer depth is in-line with the calculations from the Baldwin formula and proof that a significant layer of W fuzz can grow over a short timescale. It must be mentioned that the Baldwin formula is based on data only at surface temperatures of 1120 K and 1320 K. Some work has shown this formula to overestimate growth rates for T surf > 1400 K [3,12]. It has been suggested that a factor dependent on He ion energy might be missing from the formula [12] and that re-crystallization effects might be competing with the surface changes at higher temperatures [3].…”
Section: Comparison Of Alcator C-mod Results To Pisces and Pilot-psimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This layer depth is in-line with the calculations from the Baldwin formula and proof that a significant layer of W fuzz can grow over a short timescale. It must be mentioned that the Baldwin formula is based on data only at surface temperatures of 1120 K and 1320 K. Some work has shown this formula to overestimate growth rates for T surf > 1400 K [3,12]. It has been suggested that a factor dependent on He ion energy might be missing from the formula [12] and that re-crystallization effects might be competing with the surface changes at higher temperatures [3].…”
Section: Comparison Of Alcator C-mod Results To Pisces and Pilot-psimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be mentioned that the Baldwin formula is based on data only at surface temperatures of 1120 K and 1320 K. Some work has shown this formula to overestimate growth rates for T surf > 1400 K [3,12]. It has been suggested that a factor dependent on He ion energy might be missing from the formula [12] and that re-crystallization effects might be competing with the surface changes at higher temperatures [3]. Despite concerns about the formula raised in the literature, the comparison with the Alcator C-Mod results, which were also performed at T surf > 1400 K, and the Baldwin formula resulted in good agreement.…”
Section: Comparison Of Alcator C-mod Results To Pisces and Pilot-psimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over an ion dose threshold, this is considered to be the main phenomenon responsible for severe microstructural changes and the formation of fuzz (fiberform morphology) which occur at high CONTACT O. El-Atwani oelatwan25@gmail.com Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA ion doses [7]. If a major driver for these microstructural changes is indeed the high bubble densities in the grain matrices as has been suggested [8], it can then be hypothesized that the high grain boundary area in a nanocrystalline W microstructure will increase the ion dose threshold required to form these microstructures at temperatures where no grain growth (which changes sink strength) is possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%