2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-007-9343-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temozolomide in glioblastoma: results of administration at first relapse and in newly diagnosed cases. Is still proposable an alternative schedule to concomitant protocol?

Abstract: To evaluate if timing of chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ) was able to modify the outcome of glioblastoma (GBM), we analyzed two comparable series of supratentorial GBM patients, treated with surgery and radiotherapy, in which the administration of TMZ has been performed in the first group at first relapse and in the second group in newly diagnosed cases. The end-points were the median survival, the time tumor progression (TTP) and also the Karnofsky (KPS) scale and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data for OS‐6 were available for analysis from a total of 672 patients enrolled in 11 trials. The OS‐6 rate ranged from 46.0% to 93.3%, with the lowest noted in a trial using the standard schedule , and the highest noted in a trial using the high dose metronomic schedule . The overall OS‐6 rate was 65.0% (95% CI: 57.4–71.9%) determined by random‐effects model (heterogeneity analysis: Q = 32.461, I 2 = 69.193, P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data for OS‐6 were available for analysis from a total of 672 patients enrolled in 11 trials. The OS‐6 rate ranged from 46.0% to 93.3%, with the lowest noted in a trial using the standard schedule , and the highest noted in a trial using the high dose metronomic schedule . The overall OS‐6 rate was 65.0% (95% CI: 57.4–71.9%) determined by random‐effects model (heterogeneity analysis: Q = 32.461, I 2 = 69.193, P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, many factors will probably change during the course of the disease. Therefore, the optimal treatment schedule including neoadjuvant [2,6], metronomic [15] or dose-intensified TMZ [31] application can only be determined in large, randomized trials such as those which have been performed for anaplastic oligodendrogliomas [5,28]. As a consequence, a 4-arm trial in anaplastic astrocytoma which will allow to separate the effects of adjuvant and concurrent TMZ has been started (EORTC 26503, CATNON-trial), and a 2-arm trial in glioblastoma (RTOG trial 0525) that examines the effect of dose-intensified adjuvant TMZ has been performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical trials tried to evaluate the efficacy of TMZ in recurrent GBM with both standard 5-day schedule (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and dose-dense schedule and showed varied results (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). With respect to tumor response, clinical benefit rate (complete response, partial response and stable disease) ranged from 36.7% to 90.5%.…”
Section: Chemotherapy 331 Temozolomidementioning
confidence: 99%