1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf02667390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temper embrittlement of Ni-Cr steel by Sn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a significant observation because Sn is a very potent embrittler of steels. [15] This reveals one strong reason why the high-purity material, with very low levels of impurities, is more resistant to aging embrittlement than the conventional material. These impurity segregation results were supported with limited FEG-STEM results that showed segregation of Ni and Sn, as well as Cu, Mn, As, and Sb, on one boundary in BWS-0, 727 K/50 Kh (Figure 3).…”
Section: A Fatt and Fractographymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a significant observation because Sn is a very potent embrittler of steels. [15] This reveals one strong reason why the high-purity material, with very low levels of impurities, is more resistant to aging embrittlement than the conventional material. These impurity segregation results were supported with limited FEG-STEM results that showed segregation of Ni and Sn, as well as Cu, Mn, As, and Sb, on one boundary in BWS-0, 727 K/50 Kh (Figure 3).…”
Section: A Fatt and Fractographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The segregation of impurities to the grain boundaries dramatically compromises the toughness of conventional M152, consistent with the synergistic relationship reported between segregants and hardness on the toughness of Ni-Cr steels. Systematic studies of temper embrittlement have shown a strong synergistic effect of hardness and grain boundary P [11] or Sn [15] segregation in promoting embrittlement. The results from M152 are consistent with this syner- gism.…”
Section: Role Of Major Alloy Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the typical sources of intergranular fracture are the segregation of metalloid impurities to the austenite boundaries (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) and the formation of a deleterious second phase on the boundaries (39,40,60). The previous conclusion that the intergranular brittleness in Fe-12Mn arises from neither of these causes, but is from its inherent microstructure (14) (Table J) shows a very small amount of P. High resolution SAM studies using high sensitivity nevertheless never show a reasonable amount of P (more than 0.1 atomic percent> on the intergranular fracture surface.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many high strength steels with small amounts of metalloid impurities have been known to be very susceptible to temper embrittlement (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) over the temperature range of 550-650°C, or tempered martensite embrittlement 03-38) around 300°C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is important, in part because of the deleterious consequences of such segregation on mechanical properties [5][6][7][8]. The enrichment of the impurities at boundaries reduces their cohesive strength, leading in some circumstances to intergranular fracture under load [9][10][11]. Phosphorus is particularly po-tent in this respect [12], causing grain boundary embrittlement when a strong steel is tempered or cooled slowly through a temperature range 600-650 • C [9,13], or the so-called tempered martensite embrittlement at 300-350 • C due to the segregation at cementite-ferrite interfaces [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%