2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperate mire fluctuations from carbon sink to carbon source following changes in water table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, multi-year measurements in wetlands of northern Finland showed CO 2 uptake at 44-792 g m − 2 yr − 1 with low values during years of drought and high temperatures (Aurela et al 2009). A similar trend was found during a 6-year observation of CO 2 uxes in wetlands in northeastern Poland when in wet years the wetland area absorbed about 270 ± 70 g m − 2 yr − 1 while in drought years CO 2 was found to be 130 ± 70 g m − 2 yr − 1 (Fortuniak et al 2021).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, multi-year measurements in wetlands of northern Finland showed CO 2 uptake at 44-792 g m − 2 yr − 1 with low values during years of drought and high temperatures (Aurela et al 2009). A similar trend was found during a 6-year observation of CO 2 uxes in wetlands in northeastern Poland when in wet years the wetland area absorbed about 270 ± 70 g m − 2 yr − 1 while in drought years CO 2 was found to be 130 ± 70 g m − 2 yr − 1 (Fortuniak et al 2021).…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our study demonstrated that a shallow Boreal Shield peatland displayed tremendous interannual variability in summer ecosystem scale CO 2 fluxes in response to interannual variability in summer water deficit as manifested through the peatland WT position. While several studies conducted in deep peatlands have also observed this strong CO 2 sink in wet summers and a weak CO 2 sink in dry summers function (e.g., Aurela et al., 2007; Bubier et al., 2003; Fortuniak et al., 2021; Moore & Knowles, 1989; Strachan et al., 2016), we argue that shallow peatlands are more sensitive to the same summer water deficit than deep peatlands and, as such, their long‐term carbon sink function is likely more vulnerable to future climate change‐mediated summer drought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While several studies have observed a decline in net carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) uptake in summers with a low WT (Aurela et al., 2007; Bubier et al., 2003; Fortuniak et al., 2021; Moore & Knowles, 1989; Strachan et al., 2016) due to lower gross primary productivity (GPP) (Lund et al., 2012; Strachan et al., 2016) and increased ecosystem respiration (ER) (Aurela et al., 2007; Lund et al., 2012), peatlands are generally considered resilient to moderately dry periods (Waddington et al., 2015). Peatland ecohydrological resilience to drought is maintained through a suite of negative autogenic ecohydrological feedbacks that act to generally maintain a shallow WT and wet conditions in the near‐surface peat (Nijp et al., 2017; Waddington et al., 2015) thereby limiting the response of ER and GPP to summer water deficits (e.g., Blodau et al., 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured and modelled fluxes of CO 2 and CH 4 in 2012 were similar to previously reported rates for peatlands in the Rocky Mountains (Chimner & Cooper, 2003b; Wickland et al, 2001). Modelled NEP was negative for the 2012 growing season at the study site; however, the CO 2 source/sink role for peatlands can vary from year to year as a result of inter‐annual variability in environmental conditions (Fortuniak et al, 2021), including peatlands found in the Rocky Mountains (Millar et al, 2017). Peak SWE and summer precipitation were both below average at the site in 2012 (Millar et al, 2017), indicating that the low NEP for the growing season was due in part to drier conditions resulting in a lower water table.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%