2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature analysis of one-dimensional NiTi shape memory alloys under different loading rates and boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments were repeated at least five times for both implants. TiN coating takes longer to transform because the heat transfer coefficients of NiTi alloy and TiN coating are 20 and 11 W m –1 K –1 , respectively. The TiN layer covering the outer surface of the NiTi alloy served as a thermal barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were repeated at least five times for both implants. TiN coating takes longer to transform because the heat transfer coefficients of NiTi alloy and TiN coating are 20 and 11 W m –1 K –1 , respectively. The TiN layer covering the outer surface of the NiTi alloy served as a thermal barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clausius–Clapeyron stress-temperature relationship for Ni-Ti describes the activation process under stress of the forward transformation from austenite to martensite, as well as the reverse transformation (martensite to austenite). This relationship indicates that the activation temperatures ( As , Af , Ms and Mf ) increase linearly per unit stress [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. At higher temperatures, martensite is unstable, and therefore, returns to the austenite phase on unloading.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former corresponds to C j1 = 0 and the latter corresponds to C j2 = 0. Different boundary conditions lead to totally different thermo-mechanical coupling and should be carefully addressed in practice [28,29]. For simplicity, in the next numerical analysis, the latter is used with C 12 = C 22 = 0, C 11 = C 21 = 1.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%