2014
DOI: 10.1111/jtxs.12097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature‐ and Moisture‐Based Modeling for Prediction of Starch Gelatinization and Crumb Softness during Bread‐Baking Process

Abstract: Temperature, starch gelatinization, moisture content and softness of bread define the formation of crust and crumb regions during the baking process. A computational model was developed to study the volume expansion, temperature profile and moisture content of the bread during the baking process. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method was applied to describe mesh movement during volume expansion. Model predictions were validated with experimental measurements of bread temperature, moisture content and volume … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The crust of bread is heated to more than 100 °C during baking. The degree of starch gelatinization, the volume expansion, and the moisture content all depend on the heat transfer from the outside . Steamed bread is steamed at 100 °C; therefore, the crust is not formed and the heat transfer differs from the baking process …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The crust of bread is heated to more than 100 °C during baking. The degree of starch gelatinization, the volume expansion, and the moisture content all depend on the heat transfer from the outside . Steamed bread is steamed at 100 °C; therefore, the crust is not formed and the heat transfer differs from the baking process …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of starch gelatinization, the volume expansion, and the moisture content all depend on the heat transfer from the outside. 12 Steamed bread is steamed at 100 °C; therefore, the crust is not formed and the heat transfer differs from the baking process. 13 The use of EPS-forming LAB in baking applications is well described; 1,2,14,15 however, their functionality in the production of steamed bread is poorly documented, 16 and EPS functionality in bread and steamed bread has not been compared directly.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSM has been applied to predict the starch gelatinization in bread, wheat, and potato. For instance, baking temperature and initial moisture content were used to predict starch gelatinization and crumb softness of bread (Chhanwal and Anandharamakrishnan, ). The effects of pressure, temperature, and treatment time on the DSG were determined for wheat starch‐water mixtures (Baks et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lessening was likely due to the heat‐labile nature of lutein, 70 which has been reported by several reports regarding the effects of heat treatment on lutein concentration 71,72 . More severe lutein loss within the crust than the crumb could be explained by the temperature difference between the crust and crumb during baking, as it has been reported that the temperature at the center of breads remained at ~90 °C when baked at 210 °C 73 . Although the baking process seemed to cause lutein losses, the level of lutein in all the samples with marigold powder successfully exceeded the recommended daily intake of lutein to improve visual function (10–20 mg d −1 ) 16,17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…71,72 More severe lutein loss within the crust than the crumb could be explained by the temperature difference between the crust and crumb during baking, as it has been reported that the temperature at the center of breads remained at ∼90 °C when baked at 210 °C. 73 Although the baking process seemed to cause lutein losses, the level of lutein in all the samples with marigold powder successfully exceeded the recommended daily intake of lutein to improve visual function (10-20 mg d −1 ). 16,17 Sensory evaluation Table 6 demonstrates the evaluated sensory attributes of the bread samples.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Luteinmentioning
confidence: 86%