1932
DOI: 10.1086/280448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and Other Factors Concerned in Male Biparentalism in Habrobracon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasting findings have been reported regarding the H. hebetor sex ratio with some studies reporting a male-biased sex ratio (Nikam and Pawar 1993;Gündüz and Gülel 2005;Eliopoulos and Stathas 2008;Landge et al 2009) and others a female-biased sex ratio (Yu et al 1999;Ghimire and Phillips 2010;Farag et al 2012). These conflicting reports on H. hebetor progeny sex ratio are likely due to differences in the host larvae used, host larval stages, hostparasitoid ratio and environmental conditions (Whiting and Anderson 1932;Benson 1973;Rotary and Gerling 1973;King 1987;Ode et al 1996;Yu et al 2003;Dabhi et al 2011). Likewise the male-biased sex ratio could be due to unfavourable rearing conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrasting findings have been reported regarding the H. hebetor sex ratio with some studies reporting a male-biased sex ratio (Nikam and Pawar 1993;Gündüz and Gülel 2005;Eliopoulos and Stathas 2008;Landge et al 2009) and others a female-biased sex ratio (Yu et al 1999;Ghimire and Phillips 2010;Farag et al 2012). These conflicting reports on H. hebetor progeny sex ratio are likely due to differences in the host larvae used, host larval stages, hostparasitoid ratio and environmental conditions (Whiting and Anderson 1932;Benson 1973;Rotary and Gerling 1973;King 1987;Ode et al 1996;Yu et al 2003;Dabhi et al 2011). Likewise the male-biased sex ratio could be due to unfavourable rearing conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative explanation for the relatively high DM proportion in the mother-son mating may be that the females were kept at 10°for $12 days while their sons developed. Sex determination in N. vitripennis appears to be influenced by the age of the mother and by temperature (Beukeboom and Kamping 2006;, and some studies have suggested a temperature effect on DM production under CSD (Whiting and Anderson 1932; but see Weiser et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature at which offspring are reared probably affects the mortality of diploid males. Diploid males are less frequent in progeny reared at 20°C, compared with those reared at 30°C (Whiting & Anderson 1932). Snell (1935) proposed an alternative explanation for the <50% males in diploid offspring of close crossed H. hebetor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%