2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and precipitation effects on canola yields in Saskatchewan, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
76
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
15
76
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Greaterthan-normal levels of precipitation can also lead to lower-than-normal temperatures. The negative temperature associations with canola yield are consistent with results from other studies (Kutcher et al 2010;Harker et al 2012).…”
Section: Site Conditions Favouring Canola Yieldsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Greaterthan-normal levels of precipitation can also lead to lower-than-normal temperatures. The negative temperature associations with canola yield are consistent with results from other studies (Kutcher et al 2010;Harker et al 2012).…”
Section: Site Conditions Favouring Canola Yieldsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Temperature has evident impacts on canola seed formation during the reproductive phase when the seed yield is strongly correlated to air temperature (Faraji et al, 2009). Kutcher et al (2010) reported that canola yields were negatively correlated with the number of days with a daily maximum air temperature above 30°C on the Canadian Prairies. Very high temperature reduces seed yield by more than 50% through decreasing seed weight during reproduction (AksouhHarradj et al, 2006;Aksouh et al, 2001;Gan et al, 2004), especially during pod development when high temperature can severely reduce the number of fertile pod and seed numbers per pod (Gan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussion Heat Stress and Changes In Crop Harvest Index Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the earlier climate crop yield studies were by agronomists and meteorologists who analyzed how weather/crop yield effects varied over the crop growth life cycle. The two basic approaches adopted by agronomists included simulationcrop growth models (Jones et al 2003;Lobell and OrtizMonasterio 2007;Qian et al 2009a,b;Lobell and Burke 2010;Asseng et al 2011;Wang et al 2011; Özdo gan 2011; Urban et al 2012;Potgieter et al 2013) and regression/ correlation analyses (Robertson 1974;McCaig 1997;Kutcher et al 2010;He et al 2013). Crop growth models required detailed plant physiological data, and in combination with simulated weather data from global circulation models, they were able to predict how crop yields such as wheat responded to climatic weather conditions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%