Exploration of Halley’s Comet 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82971-0_142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature and size of the nucleus of comet P/Halley deduced from IKS infrared Vega 1 measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model qualitatively satisfies the observations of 1P/Halley which show that the only active jets are those in sunlight (Keller et al 1986(Keller et al , 1987Belton et al 1991). It is also not far from satisfying the in situ thermal measurements of 1P/ Halley which showed subsolar temperatures slightly above the local black-body temperature (Delamere et al 1986, Emerich et al 1987, suggesting that evaporative cooling is occurring in a subsurface layer and that the outflowing gas does not materially cool the surface layer. Typical cometary rotation rates are >5 h (Table II); we find below for Hyakutake a rotation period of 6.3 or 12.6 h.…”
Section: Modelssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This model qualitatively satisfies the observations of 1P/Halley which show that the only active jets are those in sunlight (Keller et al 1986(Keller et al , 1987Belton et al 1991). It is also not far from satisfying the in situ thermal measurements of 1P/ Halley which showed subsolar temperatures slightly above the local black-body temperature (Delamere et al 1986, Emerich et al 1987, suggesting that evaporative cooling is occurring in a subsurface layer and that the outflowing gas does not materially cool the surface layer. Typical cometary rotation rates are >5 h (Table II); we find below for Hyakutake a rotation period of 6.3 or 12.6 h.…”
Section: Modelssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…the free sublimation temperature of water), which is formally inconsistent with measurements of the surface temperatures of comets (Emerich et al 1987). However, the effective active fractions have been shown to be small (as confirmed here), and this approach does not exclude a hotter surface being adjacent to our active surface.…”
Section: Shape Model and Incident Angle Calculationcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Given that the contact area between particles is then likely to be very small, this would lead to a low thermal conductivity and hence low thermal inertia. Low values of thermal inertia for cometary surfaces have been inferred through surface temperature measurements for many years, starting with Emerich et al (1987). Low thermal inertia (<70 J m −2 K −1 s −1/2 ) was also noted for comet 9P/Tempel 1 .…”
Section: Thermal Inertiamentioning
confidence: 94%