2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-015-0806-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-assisted ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction with following back-extraction for HPLC/UV–Vis determination of 3-indole acetic acid in pea plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various extraction approaches have been used for this purpose, sometimes coupled with a sample clean up. These techniques involve water or organic solvent extraction, 20,23,25,52,75 the QuEChERS methodology, 67,68,71,72 reflux extraction, 51,58 extraction under stirring, 65 vortexing, 53 shaking on a rotary shaker, 19 as well as extraction assisted by auxiliary energy, such as microwave‐assisted extraction 42,43,64 and the most commonly used ultrasound‐assisted extraction. Application of auxiliary energies can intensify the mass transfer and thus improve the extraction efficiency.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various extraction approaches have been used for this purpose, sometimes coupled with a sample clean up. These techniques involve water or organic solvent extraction, 20,23,25,52,75 the QuEChERS methodology, 67,68,71,72 reflux extraction, 51,58 extraction under stirring, 65 vortexing, 53 shaking on a rotary shaker, 19 as well as extraction assisted by auxiliary energy, such as microwave‐assisted extraction 42,43,64 and the most commonly used ultrasound‐assisted extraction. Application of auxiliary energies can intensify the mass transfer and thus improve the extraction efficiency.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solvent microextractions are usually combined with a variety of techniques for separation and determination of the target analytes. The most popular of them are GC with variety of detectors such as MS, 18,22,27,31–34,38,42–47,50,53,54,62,63,66,69,73,74,76 MS/MS, 13 72 FID, 21,26,28,30,36,49,60,61 ECD 19,35,70 and nitrogen phosphorus detection (NPD), 48 flame photometric detection (FPD), 65 as well as LC, such as HPLC‐UV, 15,17,24,37,40,51,52,58,59,75 HPLC‐FLD (fluorescence detection) 20,23,25,64 and LC–MS/MS 16,39,55,67,68,71 …”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, IL used as extraction solvent, was successfully recovered by modifying the pH and it can be reused three times without any significant loss of extraction efficiencies. In addition, Sheikhian and Shirafkan [62] also successfully separated ILs from analytes by changing pH and reused ILs at least four times. These methods are capable of minimizing the cost of extraction solvents and the environment and safety issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%