2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41566-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Chaos, Memory Effect, and Domain Fluctuations in the Spiral Antiferromagnet Dy

Abstract: The spiral antiferromagnetic phase of polycrystalline dysprosium between 140 K and the Néel temperature at 178 K and its domain wall (DW) dynamics were investigated using high-resolution ultrasonic spectroscopy. Two kinetic processes of quasi-static DW motion occur under non-isothermal and isothermal conditions. A “fast” process is proportional to the rate of the temperature change and results in a new category of anelastic phenomena: magnetic transient ultrasonic internal friction (IF). This IF, related to fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retraction of needle domains over larger temperature intervals is commonly observed [16,31,62] and has been explained in terms of the elastic properties of the ferroelastic domain structures [11,12]. Moreover, the collective response of such ferroelastic domain patterns displays hallmarks for a glassy behavior as in case of low temperature relaxations during friction experiments [46] with similarities to patterns in magnetic spiral systems [63]. The main issue is whether these very sensitive reactions to external forcing or the interaction between domains in the ferroelastic phase are purely elastic in nature or whether wall polarity plays a role [23,32,64,65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The retraction of needle domains over larger temperature intervals is commonly observed [16,31,62] and has been explained in terms of the elastic properties of the ferroelastic domain structures [11,12]. Moreover, the collective response of such ferroelastic domain patterns displays hallmarks for a glassy behavior as in case of low temperature relaxations during friction experiments [46] with similarities to patterns in magnetic spiral systems [63]. The main issue is whether these very sensitive reactions to external forcing or the interaction between domains in the ferroelastic phase are purely elastic in nature or whether wall polarity plays a role [23,32,64,65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, T-dot dependent IF was reported in polycrystalline Dy below the Néel temperature, in the ordered antiferromagnetic state [13] at an ultrasonic frequency close to 90 kHz. Since the T-dot effect was observed only in the magnetically ordered state, it had been attributed to the magnetic domain structure; more specifically, to the magnetic domain walls perpendicular to the c-axis (axis of the sixth order in the hexagonal structure), which carry magnetic moments.…”
Section: Magnetomechanical Internal Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the T-dot effect was observed only in the magnetically ordered state, it had been attributed to the magnetic domain structure; more specifically, to the magnetic domain walls perpendicular to the c-axis (axis of the sixth order in the hexagonal structure), which carry magnetic moments. The possibility to observe T-dot effect at an ultrasonic frequency was associated in [13] with the presumably magnetic origin of losses, which are proportional to the frequency in the low-amplitude range. This proportionality compensates the inverse frequency dependence of the transitory IF, Equation (2), and makes the IF tr essentially frequency-independent up to a frequency approaching the frequency of domain wall relaxation.…”
Section: Magnetomechanical Internal Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations