2004
DOI: 10.1002/pen.20258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature control of injection molding. Part I: Modeling and identification

Abstract: This paper develops a mathematical model for the dynamics of a plastic injection molding machine (IMM) that may be used for the design of a temperature-control system. The research in this paper is novel in comparison to others since the derived models explicitly include the effects of zone interaction and backpressure, and do not lump these into an arbitrary disturbance signal. A series of experiments were conducted on a 150-tonne IMM to identify the parameters of the proposed model using measurements of zone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zone interaction and back pressure are treated as hidden or unmeasurable disturbances in the overall control model. This is in contrast to the model developed in Part I of this paper (10).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Zone interaction and back pressure are treated as hidden or unmeasurable disturbances in the overall control model. This is in contrast to the model developed in Part I of this paper (10).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Figure 1 illustrates an improved approach to model the interactions between zones in a pure sense. Details of this model were developed in Part I (10). In this model, the interaction is assumed to be a direct consequence of the difference in temperature between adjacent zones only.…”
Section: The System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This equation was originally devised for a temperature range of 448 to 503 K (175 to 230°C) [25] but was subsequently shown to be applicable to a polystyrene melt at up to 703 K (430°C). [26] The mean temperature of the interface for which the viscosity was estimated was assumed to be the mean of the liquid metal and pattern temperatures, which was about 593 K (320°C).…”
Section: The Effect Of Thermal Degradation Of the Polymer Pattern mentioning
confidence: 99%