Proceedings of 35th European Solid-State Device Research Conference, 2005. ESSDERC 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/essder.2005.1546631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of avalanche multiplication in submicron silicon devices

Abstract: Photomultiplication initiated by both pure electron and pure hole injection has been measured in submicron Si p + -i-n + and n + -i-p + diodes with a variety of intrinsic region thicknesses and at temperatures between 15 and 420 K. A local analysis yields expressions for the ionization coefficients as functions of electric field and of temperature which obey Chynoweth's law. Multiplication at various temperatures is computed and compares favorably with experiment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced temperature dependence follows simply because carriers then have a shorter distance in which to scatter off phonons before ionising. Similar effects are seen in short GaAs structures 75 and also in Si 76 , though the effect of temperature is weaker in this material, possibly 77 because of its softer ionisation threshold.…”
Section: Temperature Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The reduced temperature dependence follows simply because carriers then have a shorter distance in which to scatter off phonons before ionising. Similar effects are seen in short GaAs structures 75 and also in Si 76 , though the effect of temperature is weaker in this material, possibly 77 because of its softer ionisation threshold.…”
Section: Temperature Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The electric field dependences of α and β , deduced from the inverse of the mean distance between successive impact ionization events, from the SMC model are shown in figure 6. They are compared with experimental results reported by Massey et al [34,35] and Overstraeten et al [10]. Results from the SMC model are higher than experimental results at all electric fields, except for β at fields below 350 kV/cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…where d is the total distance and α(E, T ) the impact ionization coefficient, function of the field E and the temperature T via the two experimental parameters a, b. λ = 1/α, represents the length to achieve G = e. The ratio d/λ determines the gain: if two gain layers are implanted at different depths, d 1 , d 2 , they will achieve the same gain when d 1 /λ 1 = d 2 /λ 2 . Figure 3, top panel, shows the dependence of λ upon the field, according to the Massey impact ionization model [24]: in deeper gain layer designs, the drift length d is longer and the electric field lower than for shallower gain layer. The restoration power of the the bias voltage is evaluated by studying the derivative dλ/dE, bottom panel of Figure 3: for very high fields, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%