1977
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.43.2030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Dependence of Debye-Waller Factors in bcc Metals. I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, the values were obtained by fitting the Fe {220} Bragg edges, selected because they make the minimum contribution of magnetic scattering to the transmission spectra at shorter wavelengths (Powers, 1938). The present result is compared against previous experimental values from Debrunner & Morrison (1965) as mentioned by Prakash et al (1975) and Kharoo et al (1977), and from Haworth (1960), who used X-ray diffraction and similarly focused on the Fe {220} diffraction peak covering the temperature range of 286-1190 K. Theoretical values calculated by Prakash et al (1975) and Kharoo et al (1977) are also shown. The values from the present work agree well with the previous experimental values, considering the scatter in the results by Haworth.…”
Section: Debye-waller Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, the values were obtained by fitting the Fe {220} Bragg edges, selected because they make the minimum contribution of magnetic scattering to the transmission spectra at shorter wavelengths (Powers, 1938). The present result is compared against previous experimental values from Debrunner & Morrison (1965) as mentioned by Prakash et al (1975) and Kharoo et al (1977), and from Haworth (1960), who used X-ray diffraction and similarly focused on the Fe {220} diffraction peak covering the temperature range of 286-1190 K. Theoretical values calculated by Prakash et al (1975) and Kharoo et al (1977) are also shown. The values from the present work agree well with the previous experimental values, considering the scatter in the results by Haworth.…”
Section: Debye-waller Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The data were derived from the Fe powder data collected at different temperatures as described in Section 3.3. Previously Haworth (1960), Prakash et al (1975) and Kharoo et al (1977) compared the Debye-Waller-factor dependencies on temperature in terms of the temperature parameter Y, which is defined by Y ¼ log 10 exp ð= sin Þ 2 ð2W T 0 À 2W T Þ ¼ ð= sin Þ 2 log 10 ð T = T 0 Þ;…”
Section: Debye-waller Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The (311) planes are nearly independent of the anions. The intensities I 220 , I 311 , I 222 , I 400 , I 422 , I 511 and I 440 were calculated using equation (17). The calculated and observed relative results were obtained by normalizing with respect to the most intensive reflection I 311 , which has been taken as 100%.…”
Section: Debye-waller Factor (Dwf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature variation of the DWF for alkali and nobel metals have been reported [14]. The DWF have been calculated for five FCC metals: copper, silver, gold, aluminum and nickel [15,16] and for three bcc metals: sodium, α-iron and chromium [17][18][19]. The Debye-Waller factor of molybdenum has been determined by the powder neutron diffraction technique with a double-axis neutron diffractometer [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%