2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of hydroxyl radical reactions with chloramine species in aqueous solution

Abstract: The absolute temperature-dependent kinetics for the reaction between hydroxyl radicals and the chloramine water disinfectant species monochloramine (NHCl), as well as dichloramine (NHCl) and trichloramine (NCl), have been determined using electron pulse radiolysis and transient absorption spectroscopy. These radical reaction rate constants were fast, with values of 6.06 × 10, 2.57 × 10, and 1.67 × 10 M s at 25 °C for NHCl, NHCl, and NCl, respectively. The corresponding temperature dependence of these reaction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the complexity of the current reaction scheme, the mechanistic determination of R7 and R8 is beyond the scope of the current research and is an avenue of future research. Potential cross-interactions remain to be investigated between the chloramine species and known decomposition products of ONOOH/ONOO – , including hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical. , In addition, deviations between the measured NO 2 – and NO 3 – formation and UF + RNS model simulated values (see Table S13 in Supporting Information S2.13) indicate the need for kinetic N 2 , NO 2 – , and NO 3 – data to validate and/or revise the Kirsch et al ONOOH/ONOO – decomposition model for drinking water conditions and temperatures. Finally, the UF + RNS model overpredicted the N 2 O data at pH 10 (Figure d) but underpredicted N 2 O at pH 7 to 9 (Figure a–c), with the corresponding WRSS and AWRSS shown in Table S10, illustrating the need to measure N 2 , NO 2 – , and NO 3 – kinetically in future work to facilitate further advancement of the UF + RNS model.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the complexity of the current reaction scheme, the mechanistic determination of R7 and R8 is beyond the scope of the current research and is an avenue of future research. Potential cross-interactions remain to be investigated between the chloramine species and known decomposition products of ONOOH/ONOO – , including hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical. , In addition, deviations between the measured NO 2 – and NO 3 – formation and UF + RNS model simulated values (see Table S13 in Supporting Information S2.13) indicate the need for kinetic N 2 , NO 2 – , and NO 3 – data to validate and/or revise the Kirsch et al ONOOH/ONOO – decomposition model for drinking water conditions and temperatures. Finally, the UF + RNS model overpredicted the N 2 O data at pH 10 (Figure d) but underpredicted N 2 O at pH 7 to 9 (Figure a–c), with the corresponding WRSS and AWRSS shown in Table S10, illustrating the need to measure N 2 , NO 2 – , and NO 3 – kinetically in future work to facilitate further advancement of the UF + RNS model.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential cross-interactions remain to be investigated between the chloramine species and known decomposition products of ONOOH/ONOO − , including hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical. 44,45 In addition, deviations between the measured NO 2 − and NO 3 − formation and UF + RNS model simulated values (see Table S13 in Supporting Information S2.13) indicate the need for kinetic N 2 , NO 2 − , and NO 3 − data to validate and/or revise the Kirsch et al 17 Mechanistic Considerations. This study presented multiple lines of evidence to demonstrate that NHCl 2 hydrolysis resulted in HNO formation (Scheme 1, U7), the so-called unidentified reactive intermediate (I) in the UF model.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the coexistence of chloride with NH 2 Cl also transformed SO 4 •– and Cl • to Cl 2 •– (reactions 2 and 3). HO • reacts with NH 2 Cl with a rate constant of 5.1 × 10 8 M –1 s –1 , and the second-order rate constant between SO 4 •– and NH 2 Cl of 2.4 × 10 7 M –1 s –1 was measured by laser flash photolysis (Text S4). For instance, up to 68% of HO • and 7% of SO 4 •– were scavenged by 4 mM NH 2 Cl (Texts S5.1 and S5.2 and Tables S3–S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…•− and Cl • to Cl 2 •− (reactions 2 and 3). HO • reacts with NH 2 Cl with a rate constant of 5.1 × 10 8 M −1 s −1 , 44 and the second-order rate constant between SO 4…”
Section: •−mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At higher reaction times, the active hydroxyl production increases. The reaction performance improved when ample time for the oxidation process and free radical's attack on Ampicillin molecules were provided [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%