2016 Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/dsd.2016.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Dependence of ROPUF on FPGA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a measure of how many number of bits to be flipped during one particular PUF instance under different supply and environmental conditions. This can be mathematically expressed in expression (1) [10].…”
Section: Metrics Of Physical Unclonable Function 21 Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a measure of how many number of bits to be flipped during one particular PUF instance under different supply and environmental conditions. This can be mathematically expressed in expression (1) [10].…”
Section: Metrics Of Physical Unclonable Function 21 Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending upon the size of the CRP, PUFs can be classified as two types such as weak and strong PUFs [4][5][6]. Weak PUFs (Anderson PUF) have limited number of CRPs, stable responses from noise and environment variations for multiple readings, output response should be preserve private, and response is strong enough and depends on intrinsic process variations [8][9][10][11]. Strong PUFs (Memory and delay based PUFs) have large number of CRPs, response generated from an each challenge could be strong enough to environmental variations (better reliability), no restriction to preserve the output response, not susceptible any attacks and not feasible to manufacture two PUFs with the same responses.…”
Section: Classifications Of Pufsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches for deriving multiple bits from each PUF node by quantisation, can be found, e.g., in [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]; the list is not exhaustive. Note that also approaches exists which group bits extracted from several PUF nodes to one multi-valued symbol, e.g., [29], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%