2020
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of strain–phonon coefficient in epitaxial Ge/Si(001): A comprehensive analysis

Abstract: We investigate the temperature dependence of the Ge Raman mode strain–phonon coefficient in Ge/Si heteroepitaxial layers. By analyzing the temperature‐dependent evolution of both the Raman Ge─Ge line and of the Ge lattice strain, we obtain a linear dependence of the strain–phonon coefficient as a function of temperature. Our findings provide an efficient method for capturing the temperature‐dependent strain relaxation mechanism in heteroepitaxial systems. Furthermore, we show that the rather large variability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By means of the approach of Van de Walle, [ 22 ] the offset for valence and conduction bands can be estimated as a function of strain. Considering the thermal strain εth(T) [ 20 ] (blue line of Figure 3d), the difference in energy between the direct gap for heavy hole (Enormalg(HH)) and light hole (Enormalg(LH)) varies between 12 and 20 meV in the investigated temperature range (orange line of Figure 3d), in good agreement with the results in Montanari et al [ 23 ]…”
Section: Effect Of Strain Gradient On Pl Spectrasupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By means of the approach of Van de Walle, [ 22 ] the offset for valence and conduction bands can be estimated as a function of strain. Considering the thermal strain εth(T) [ 20 ] (blue line of Figure 3d), the difference in energy between the direct gap for heavy hole (Enormalg(HH)) and light hole (Enormalg(LH)) varies between 12 and 20 meV in the investigated temperature range (orange line of Figure 3d), in good agreement with the results in Montanari et al [ 23 ]…”
Section: Effect Of Strain Gradient On Pl Spectrasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In Figure a we report the experimental spectra obtained at different temperatures and for different positions of the laser spot. In the area outside the pillar, only thermal strain, arising from the difference between the coefficients of thermal expansion of Si and Ge, [ 20 ] is playing a role. In the inner area of the pillar, the contribution of mechanical deformation is also effective.…”
Section: Effect Of Strain Gradient On Pl Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 (c)) of the Ge–Ge peak by the strain-phonon coefficient (− 395 cm −1 ) proposed by Manganelli et al . 30 and Ge 111 peak positions in the XRD patterns (Fig. 2 (c)) by the Bragg’s law.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2 (c)) by the Bragg’s law. The ε values are different between the Raman and XRD analyses, which is likely because the strain-phonon coefficient varies depending on the measurement environment and sample specifications 30 . Nevertheless, ε obtained from the Raman and XRD analyses have similar tendency with respect to Δ α .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%