1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.369152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of the domain wall width in LaAlO3

Abstract: Twin wall related diffuse scattering intensities from a single crystal of LaAlO3 were determined using high-resolution x-ray diffraction methods. Rocking curves were measured for sample temperatures between 295 and 900 K. The wall thickness W was determined by comparing the observed diffraction profiles with structure factor calculations for a tanh(x/W) wall profile. It is shown that W≈20 Å at low temperatures and increases slowly with temperature reaching values in excess of 200 Å near Tc≈850 K with W∝|T−Tc|−… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
92
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the domain wall thickness cannot be exactly measured by polarizing light microscope because of the misalignment between light beam and domain walls. In classic theory, the relationship between domain wall thickness and temperature was predicted as 20,21 W t / ðT À T c Þ À1 ; where W t is defined as domain wall thickness. The domain wall thickness becomes larger when the temperature is far above Curie temperature (T c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the domain wall thickness cannot be exactly measured by polarizing light microscope because of the misalignment between light beam and domain walls. In classic theory, the relationship between domain wall thickness and temperature was predicted as 20,21 W t / ðT À T c Þ À1 ; where W t is defined as domain wall thickness. The domain wall thickness becomes larger when the temperature is far above Curie temperature (T c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the twin walls in EuTiO 3 are subject to pinning by oxygen vacancies, as in LaAlO 3 , it is likely that their freezing interval will also be in the vicinity of ∼450 K, i.e., well above T c . In this case the observed variations in Q −1 most likely reflect changes in the number density, N, and thickness, w, of ferroelastic twin walls, which are expected to increase according to w Ý N Ý (T c − T ) −1 as T → T c [50][51][52][53]. Interaction of the twin walls with the underlying lattice and point defects is known to be stronger for thin walls than thick walls [54,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic properties of LaAlO 3 measured at RUS frequencies are dominated by intrinsic effects from strain/order parameter coupling and the anelastic losses have been understood in terms of local and rather limited displacements of the twin walls [43]. Twin walls in purely ferroelastic materials tend to have thicknesses corresponding to just a few unit cells [51], whereas magnetic domain walls are typically much thicker than this. If there is any coupling between a magnetic order parameter and strain, it is inevitable that the twin walls which separate domains that are both magnetic and ferroelastic will involve some combination of these limiting cases.…”
Section: Ferroelastic Properties Of Ndcomentioning
confidence: 99%