2003
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200301872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependence of the indirect band gap and related optical parameters of (NH4)2ZnCl4:xSr2+ single crystals

Abstract: Optical transmittance measurements were carried out near the absorption edge of (NH 4 ) 2 ZnCl 4 : x Sr 2+ single crystals, where x = 0.00, 0.020, 0.039, 0.087 or 0.144 wt%. The dependence of the absorption coefficient (α) on photon energy in the range 3.4 -6.4 eV and on temperature in the range 276 -350 K was examined. With increasing temperature the absorption edge was shifted to the lower energy side; this shift was attributed to the temperature dependence of electron-lattice interactions. Due to the presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For x=0.087 or 0.144, this band is completely disappeared and instead we observe a change in the rate by which α increases with hν. The reason for the existence and disappearance of this band was discussed elsewhere [19]. It is worthy to know that similar absorption bands for different crystals of the A 2 BX 4 family were also observed [20,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For x=0.087 or 0.144, this band is completely disappeared and instead we observe a change in the rate by which α increases with hν. The reason for the existence and disappearance of this band was discussed elsewhere [19]. It is worthy to know that similar absorption bands for different crystals of the A 2 BX 4 family were also observed [20,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Fig. (5) contains also the same dependence for irradiation with γ the same samples extracted from another study in our laboratory for the sake of comparison [19]. The observed difference between the two cases may be due to the difference between the absolute value of the energy of the γ-and e-beam irradiation used in the two cases.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 80%