The power conversion effi ciency (PCE) of solar cells or photovoltaic cells is given by the product of their short-circuit photocurrent density J sc , fi ll factor (FF) and open-circuit voltage V oc . For organic solar cells, in which the photoactive layer (PAL) is an organic semiconductor (OSC) comprising intimatelymixed donor (D) and acceptor (A) phases, these performance parameters depend on a complex interplay of several processes, some more strongly related to materials and processing while others to cell design. [ 1 ] In brief, the overall effi ciency of the solar-to-electrical energy conversion chain depends on the following effi ciencies. The cell absorption effi ciency for the incident solar photons is determined primarily by the PAL but infl uenced by optical interference effects. The photocarrier generation effi ciency depends on the fraction of excitons that can dissociate to charge-separated pairs through processes that are still under debate, although this is known to be a property of the electronic structure and morphology of the DA interface. Then the collection effi ciency is determined by internal (non-geminate) recombination losses. The maximum electrochemical potential difference available from the carriers depends on electronic structure and other effects. The current-voltage ( JV ) characteristic under solar irradiation refl ects the outcome of all of these processes, which are heavily coupled. [2][3][4] Nevertheless signifi cant advances have occurred in some aspects, such as the correlation of cell properties with PAL and the DA morphology. [ 5 ] The maximum V oc available has been suggested to vary linearly with the energy gap between the highest-occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) band edge of D and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) band edge of A, subjected to a loss of a few tenths of an eV, often thought to be 0.3 eV. [ 6,7 ] However a number of electrical parameters of the cells are not known accurately, including the relevant electronic energies, and so it is not possible to be certain about the magnitude of this offset. Recent literature for example has tended to emphasize the correlation of V oc with disparate sources of losses, including binding energy of the charge-transfer exciton, [ 8 ] internal recombination, [ 9 ] or sub-gap absorption through a quasi-equilibrium detailed balance. [ 10 ] Nevertheless the V bi is a more fundamental parameter of the cell [11][12][13] and hence a natural starting point to understand the factors that limit V oc in high-performance organic solar cells. However the V bi of even prototypical P3HT:PCBM cells has not been directly established, but estimated between 0.6 and 0.9 V. [ 14 ] Because of strong para meter coupling, this hampers Here, using crosslinked P3HT network:PCBM cells with predefi ned ultrafi ne donor-acceptor morphology and very high internal quantum effi ciencies, the built-in potential V bi is measured to decouple and reliably extract other key parameters of the cells. Using the refi ned device parameters, the ge...