2012
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/47/475302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dependent empirical pseudopotential theory for self-assembled quantum dots

Abstract: We develop a temperature dependent empirical pseudopotential theory to study the electronic and optical properties of self-assembled quantum dots (QDs) at finite temperature. The theory takes the effects of both lattice expansion and lattice vibration into account. We apply the theory to InAs/GaAs QDs. For the unstrained InAs/GaAs heterostructure, the conduction band offset increases whereas the valence band offset decreases with increasing temperature, and there is a type-I to type-II transition at approximat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure b, the ZFS parameter D has a nonlinear dependence on temperature from 5 to 600 K, and we fit it with the Varshni empirical equation: where D 0 is the value of D at T = 0 K; α and β are fitting parameter characteristics of the given material, which should be positive to ensure the monotonicity of D as a function of temperature: α is an empirical constant and β is commonly supposed to be related and comparable to the Debye temperature Θ D . While this equation is regrettably very weak in its theoretical foundation and inconsistent with the Debye model in the low-temperature limit, it is still one of the most widely quoted models due to the irreplaceable simplicity and monotonicity and has had great success in describing the temperature dependence of energy gaps in many semiconductor bulk and nanopowdered materials. In our experiment, the fitting based on the Varshni function showed outstanding agreement over the entire measured temperature range. As an example, the fit of the Varshni equation with parameters D 0 = 3584 ± 1 MHz, α = 1.06 ± 0.05 MHz/K, and β = 559 ± 51 K in Figure b describes the D shifts extremely well, with errors less than 12 MHz in the 5–600 K range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In Figure b, the ZFS parameter D has a nonlinear dependence on temperature from 5 to 600 K, and we fit it with the Varshni empirical equation: where D 0 is the value of D at T = 0 K; α and β are fitting parameter characteristics of the given material, which should be positive to ensure the monotonicity of D as a function of temperature: α is an empirical constant and β is commonly supposed to be related and comparable to the Debye temperature Θ D . While this equation is regrettably very weak in its theoretical foundation and inconsistent with the Debye model in the low-temperature limit, it is still one of the most widely quoted models due to the irreplaceable simplicity and monotonicity and has had great success in describing the temperature dependence of energy gaps in many semiconductor bulk and nanopowdered materials. In our experiment, the fitting based on the Varshni function showed outstanding agreement over the entire measured temperature range. As an example, the fit of the Varshni equation with parameters D 0 = 3584 ± 1 MHz, α = 1.06 ± 0.05 MHz/K, and β = 559 ± 51 K in Figure b describes the D shifts extremely well, with errors less than 12 MHz in the 5–600 K range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Afterwards, ab initio theoretical studies abounded [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. As these ab initio calculations suffer from well-known bandgap errors and require high computational cost [26], semi-empirical methods were preferred [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. In particular, O'Reilly using a tight-binding method took into account the crystals under biaxial compression and tension to study the [0 0 1] axial deformation potential b in group-III-V semiconductors [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, ab initio theoretical studies soared [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. As these ab initio calculations suffer from well-known bandgap errors and require high computational cost [26], semiempirical methods have also been preferred [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Particularly, O'Reilly using tightbinding method has taken into account the crystals under biaxial compression and tension to study [001] axial deformation potential b in group-III-V semiconductors [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%