1999
DOI: 10.1021/je9801819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Dependent Vapor Pressures of Chlorinated Catechols, Syringols, and Syringaldehydes

Abstract: The vapor pressures of nine chlorinated catechols, syringols, and syringaldehydes were determined as a function of temperature with a gas chromatographic retention time technique. The vapor pressures at 298.15 K were in the range of 0.02-1 Pa, and the enthalpies of vaporization, between 68 and 82 kJ‚mol -1 . The validity of the technique was established by a calibration involving four chlorinated phenols with well-known vapor pressures. Using these data and previously reported solubility data, Henry's law cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility cannot be excluded, because of the use of a nonpolar stationary phase and mostly nonpolar calibration compounds. We have previously used the GC-RT technique for polar phenolic compounds and obtained good agreement with directly determined vapor pressure values, but the possibility exists that the true volatility of the polyflourinated chemicals investigated here is lower than reported in Tables and .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This possibility cannot be excluded, because of the use of a nonpolar stationary phase and mostly nonpolar calibration compounds. We have previously used the GC-RT technique for polar phenolic compounds and obtained good agreement with directly determined vapor pressure values, but the possibility exists that the true volatility of the polyflourinated chemicals investigated here is lower than reported in Tables and .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In a few cases the authors represent their data as a correlation, rather than quoting the measured raw data (e.g. Lei et al, 1999). In these cases each dataset is usually represented by two points at the extremes of the experimental temperature range.…”
Section: Selection Of Vapour Pressure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GC-RT technique is a well-established method for estimating the p L 298 /Pa and/or Δ VAP H /kJ·mol –1 of low-polarity compounds, such as organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), , polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), , polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), , perfluorinated compounds, polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). , GC-RT has also been applied to the measured p L 298 /Pa of polar compounds such as organophosphate esters (OPEs), ,, phthalate esters, , phenolic compounds, and fatty acids . The GC-RT method has also been used to estimate the K OA 298 of PBDEs, PCBs, PCNs, , perfluorinated compounds, polybrominated biphenyls, and OPEs …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of the GC-RT method indicates that errors from these sources can be orders of magnitude. 25 Increased accuracy for compounds of differing polarity has been obtained by selecting reference/calibration compounds of the same chemical class as those tested; for example, phenols, 18 phthalates, 17 and fatty acids. 19 While preferable, this approach was not feasible because of the scarcity of well-characterized polar reference/ calibration compounds when screening large numbers of compounds having differing functionalities, as in this paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%