2023
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature dissimilarity drives flower–visitor interaction turnover across elevation in the Mexican Transition Zone

Abstract: AimMost biodiversity studies have considered species to be isolated entities, neglecting the fact that their biotic interactions and spatial variation are fundamental to their persistence across elevational gradients. Here, using a standardized sampling methodology, we evaluated how and why the composition of flower–visitor interactions (i.e. beta diversity) varies over an extensive elevational gradient. Specifically, we aimed to identify which biotic (species turnover) and abiotic factors (temperature, precip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatio‐temporal interaction β‐diversity is largely driven by species turnover. The high contribution of species turnover to spatial interaction β‐diversity is comparable to trends observed in other systems (Simanonok and Burkle 2014, Trøjelsgaard et al 2015, Minachilis et al 2023, Luna et al 2023) and suggests that rewiring of plant–pollinator interactions is not very common across space, possibly due to spatial abiotic gradients (Simanonok and Burkle 2014, Trøjelsgaard et al 2015) or dispersal boundaries (Trøjelsgaard et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatio‐temporal interaction β‐diversity is largely driven by species turnover. The high contribution of species turnover to spatial interaction β‐diversity is comparable to trends observed in other systems (Simanonok and Burkle 2014, Trøjelsgaard et al 2015, Minachilis et al 2023, Luna et al 2023) and suggests that rewiring of plant–pollinator interactions is not very common across space, possibly due to spatial abiotic gradients (Simanonok and Burkle 2014, Trøjelsgaard et al 2015) or dispersal boundaries (Trøjelsgaard et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Plant–pollinator interactions in xeric longleaf pine savannas are highly variable across space and time, similar to other plant–pollinator systems (Simanonok and Burkle 2014, Trøjelsgaard et al 2015, CaraDonna et al 2017, Souza et al 2021, Luna et al 2023, Minachilis et al 2023). Spatio‐temporal interaction β‐diversity is largely driven by species turnover.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%