2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-021-05081-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature effect on CuO nanoparticles via facile hydrothermal approach to effective utilization of UV–visible region for photocatalytic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pure CuO nanoparticles under sunlight irradiation exhibit better degradation due to their e-h pair restriction [42]. The UV light irradiation induces the OH radicals which can dissociate the dye compounds into noxious products [43][44][45][46]. The lowest bandgap and combination of other materials enhanced the catalytic activity because of their large surface area and electron tapping on the surface [45][46][47].…”
Section: Photocatalyst Comparison Of Cuo-based Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pure CuO nanoparticles under sunlight irradiation exhibit better degradation due to their e-h pair restriction [42]. The UV light irradiation induces the OH radicals which can dissociate the dye compounds into noxious products [43][44][45][46]. The lowest bandgap and combination of other materials enhanced the catalytic activity because of their large surface area and electron tapping on the surface [45][46][47].…”
Section: Photocatalyst Comparison Of Cuo-based Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UV light irradiation induces the OH radicals which can dissociate the dye compounds into noxious products [43][44][45][46]. The lowest bandgap and combination of other materials enhanced the catalytic activity because of their large surface area and electron tapping on the surface [45][46][47]. The large surface area and metal tapping on the surface increase the free radical formation.…”
Section: Photocatalyst Comparison Of Cuo-based Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 ] In addition, the location of the CuO Raman peak was mainly related to the size effect. [ 24 ] For the chrysanthemum‐like CuO–TiO 2 ‐2.5 nanocomposite film, in addition to the CuO Raman characteristic peak, a new Raman characteristic peak appeared at 145 cm −1 , which corresponded to the Eg peak of anatase TiO 2. [ 25 ] The Raman characteristic peak of Ag metal was not found in the chrysanthemum‐like CuO–TiO 2 ‐2.5‐Ag‐2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These samples were further analyzed using visible Raman-scattering spectroscopy (Figure S5). Raman spectroscopy of the pure CuO shows a band centered at 282 cm –1 (A g ), corresponding to phase rotations of CuO, and two bands centered at 332 and 618 cm –1 (B g ) which were assigned to the bending of CuO and symmetrical stretching of oxygen, respectively. , Raman spectroscopy of bulk MgO did not show any significant Raman bands because of its inversion symmetry, and the peaks located at 276 and 442 cm –1 correspond to the transverse acoustic (TA) phonon at the nanostructure zone boundary and the zone center, respectively . Raman spectroscopy of Cu/MgO shows a conspicuous band centered at 569 cm –1 , and its intensity gradually increased with a rise of the Mg content in Cu/MgO catalysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%