2012
DOI: 10.3354/ame01583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature effects on the heterotrophic bacteria, heterotrophic nanoflagellates, and microbial top predators of the NW Mediterranean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
20
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(106 reference statements)
6
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with Hoch and Kirchman (1993) who reported that the bacterial growth rate is directly related to temperature during the cold months, but not during warm ones. A similar result was found in the NW Mediterranean, where small differences between the growth rates of bacteria under warming conditions and ambient temperatures were found in summer, and such difference increased in winter, when in situ temperatures were the lowest (Vázquez-Dominguez et al, 2012). Contrary to bacteria, the increase in growth rates of autotrophic picoplankton (PROC and SYN) due to an increase in temperature was also established in summer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with Hoch and Kirchman (1993) who reported that the bacterial growth rate is directly related to temperature during the cold months, but not during warm ones. A similar result was found in the NW Mediterranean, where small differences between the growth rates of bacteria under warming conditions and ambient temperatures were found in summer, and such difference increased in winter, when in situ temperatures were the lowest (Vázquez-Dominguez et al, 2012). Contrary to bacteria, the increase in growth rates of autotrophic picoplankton (PROC and SYN) due to an increase in temperature was also established in summer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Edwards and Richardson, 2004;Wiltshire et al, 2008;Montoya and Raffaelli, 2010). It is well established that temperature significantly influences microbiological processes such as production (Rivkin et al, 1996;Hoppe et al, 2008;Šoli c et al, 2018a), growth rate (White et al, 1991;Shiah and Ducklow, 1994) and growth efficiency (Rivkin and Legendre, 2001), as well as grazing on bacteria (Vaqué et al, 1994;Krstulovi c, 1994, 1995;Vázquez-Dominguez et al, 2012) and viral lysis (Danovaro et al, 2011;Lara et al, 2013;Maranger et al, 2015;Tsai et al, 2015;Ordulj et al, 2017). Furthermore, temperature influences the complex microbial trophic interactions, altering food web structure and ecosystem functioning (Petchey et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association network analysis further supports significant correlations between temperature and certain microbial groups (Fig. ), as previously reported (Kirchman et al ., ; Vázquez‐Domíniguez et al ., ). At the bottom, ambient temperature negatively affected Gamma‐ and Betaproteobacteria (r = −0.84, p 0 < 0.005 and r = −0.93, p 0 < 0.0005, respectively, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…), nutrient availability, grazing, and viral lysis [11][12][13]. It is well-established that temperature significantly influences microbiological processes such as production [14], growth rate [15,16], and growth efficiency [17], as well as grazing on bacteria [9,18,19] and viral lysis [20][21][22][23]. However, these processes have shown different sensitivity to temperature increases, which ultimately determines how the microbial community will respond to warming [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%