1997
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1997393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature forecast and dome seeing minimization

Abstract: Abstract. Dome seeing may strongly deteriorate the final sharpness of a point source astronomical image, reducing its Image Quality. Both the telescope enclosure and the mirrors may contribute to the dome seeing, if air convection is induced by differences of temperature between them and external air. The prediction of the external air temperature with respect to a given time interval allows one to preset in advance the air conditioning temperature value in the telescope enclosure. With the aim to study the ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also we study the ability of the MesoNh model to simulate the temperature near the ground around the telescope. The results show that the difference between the measured and simulated temperatures is ∆T ≤ 3 degrees, which is, comparable to the results obtained with other techniques, such as multiregression (Buffa & Porceddu 1997). This is a very promising result considering that it was proven (Racine et al 1991) that to prevent seeing caused by outside temperature T 2m and the primary mirror temperature T M differences, the T 2m should be known with a precision of about 1 degree.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Also we study the ability of the MesoNh model to simulate the temperature near the ground around the telescope. The results show that the difference between the measured and simulated temperatures is ∆T ≤ 3 degrees, which is, comparable to the results obtained with other techniques, such as multiregression (Buffa & Porceddu 1997). This is a very promising result considering that it was proven (Racine et al 1991) that to prevent seeing caused by outside temperature T 2m and the primary mirror temperature T M differences, the T 2m should be known with a precision of about 1 degree.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, they proved that in the case of the fuzzy coding of seeing (dividing the seeing degree into Good, Moderate, and Bad), the forecasting accuracy of dynamic recurrent neural networks outperforms that of KNN methods. Buffa and Porceddu [89] studied the problem of forecasting observatory site temperatures and proved that the nonlinear autoregressive neural network model is more competitive than the traditional linear filtering algorithm.…”
Section: Dome Seeingmentioning
confidence: 99%