Day 1 Wed, September 10, 2014 2014
DOI: 10.2118/170316-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-Induced Uncertainty of the Effective Fracture Pressures: Assessment and Control

Abstract: The constant bottom-hole pressure (CBHP) method of managed pressure drilling (MPD) maintains wellbore pressure above the wellbore stability or pore pressure and below the fracture pressure. It is common practice to perform frequent dynamic formation integrity/leakoff tests (FIT/LOT) to measure the fracture pressure. Several authors addressed the uncertainty in the measured value of the fracture pressure caused by mud compressibility and thixotropy. Moreover, field evidence indicates considerable variations in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the uncertainty of formation lithology, the uncertainty of formation pressure, the uncertainty of mechanical properties of rocks, and the unstable wellbore pressure, the input parameters of wellbore stability analysis never can be known precisely. In other words, the input parameters are often uncertain, which might cause an incorrect result [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In order to quantify the influence of uncertain parameters on wellbore stability and SMWW, it's necessary to utilize reliability assessment method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the uncertainty of formation lithology, the uncertainty of formation pressure, the uncertainty of mechanical properties of rocks, and the unstable wellbore pressure, the input parameters of wellbore stability analysis never can be known precisely. In other words, the input parameters are often uncertain, which might cause an incorrect result [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In order to quantify the influence of uncertain parameters on wellbore stability and SMWW, it's necessary to utilize reliability assessment method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Udegbunam et al [23] investigated typical fracture and collapse models with respect to inaccuracies in the input data with a stochastic method. Kinik et al [24,25] presented a mathematical model to estimate the true fracture pressure from the leak-off-test data, and the QRA was also involved to represent the probability-density distribution of fracture pressure. Gholami et al [26] applied the QRA to consider the uncertainty of input parameters in determining of the mud weight window for different failure criteria, such as the Mohr-Coulomb (M-C), Hoek-Brown (H-B) and Mogi-Coulomb (MG-C) criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss circulation is related to the effect of fluid properties on the fracture gradient (Kinik et al 2014;Chen et al 2014). Dynamic conditions and fluid properties should be considered to avoid overestimating the fracture pressure.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%