2013
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2012.2235507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature Profile of Hotspots in Narrow Current-Biased Superconducting Strips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5(b)]. All these findings are in good qualitative agreement with recent experiments on superconducting thin films [13][14][15][16]. Figure 5(c) shows the response time of all three investigated samples as a function of time at T = 0.98T c .…”
Section: Voltage-time Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5(b)]. All these findings are in good qualitative agreement with recent experiments on superconducting thin films [13][14][15][16]. Figure 5(c) shows the response time of all three investigated samples as a function of time at T = 0.98T c .…”
Section: Voltage-time Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is believed that the PSC regime is confined to a small temperature range in the vicinity of the transition temperature T c [3,5] and that the HS mechanism dominates at lower temperatures [12]. However, recent studies implementing the pulsed-current technique revealed that hot spots never form unless PSCs have first been nucleated [13][14][15][16]. This experimental technique has been shown to be an effective tool in the study of the evolution of the resistive state in current-driven superconductors and furthermore it has a number of advantages over conventional techniques such as multiprobe voltage measurements [17], laser imaging [9], and radio-frequency synchronization [5,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value of the exponent p is provided by a microscopic model [16] for the heat flow between two solids across their interface via 3D Debye phonons. Further modifications of the selfheating normal domain model were made by incorporating the state (normal/superconducting) and temperature dependence of the electron thermal conductivity [17][18][19][20] or by varying the exponent p [21,22]. Microscopic models [16,23,24] describing the heat flow from electrons to phonons in the film and further to phonons in the substrate show that the exponent p is not necessary an integer and may have any value from 4 to 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value of the exponent p is provided by a microscopic model [16] for the heat flow between two solids across their interface via 3-d Debye phonons. Further modifications of the self-heating normal domain model were made by incorporating the state (normal/superconducting) and temperature dependence of the electron thermal conductivity [17][18][19][20] or by varying the exponent p [21,22]. Microscopic models [16,23,24] describing the heat flow from electrons to phonons in the film and further to phonons in the substrate show that the exponent p is not necessary an integer and may have any value from 4 to 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%