2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2015.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature programmed desorption of weakly bound adsorbates on Au(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous temperature programmed desorption (TPD) results for CO on Au(111) under low coverage situations (relevant for our work), the values of and des have been reported to be 2×10 15 Hz and 0.18 eV, respectively. 2 We point out that this previously published frequency factor (2×10 15 Hz) is erroneous, possibly due to a typographical error. As a consequence, we have re-analyzed the previously reported TPD results and find = 3 × 10 17 Hz.…”
Section: (3) Estimating the Residence Time Of Co On Au(111) Surfacementioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on previous temperature programmed desorption (TPD) results for CO on Au(111) under low coverage situations (relevant for our work), the values of and des have been reported to be 2×10 15 Hz and 0.18 eV, respectively. 2 We point out that this previously published frequency factor (2×10 15 Hz) is erroneous, possibly due to a typographical error. As a consequence, we have re-analyzed the previously reported TPD results and find = 3 × 10 17 Hz.…”
Section: (3) Estimating the Residence Time Of Co On Au(111) Surfacementioning
confidence: 79%
“…We note that this value is consistent with that reported previously. 2 Using the relation = / , we obtain = 3 × 10 17 Hz.…”
Section: (3) Estimating the Residence Time Of Co On Au(111) Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…46; NO on Au(111) (0.24 eV binding energy) is from ref. 47; and CO on Au(111) (0.18 eV binding energy 48 ) is from ref. 49.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Conversely, TPD requires the signal to be maximized, therefore a short sample detector distance, typically 1 mm, with a large entrance aperture is required. 13 Although TPD and MBS have been previously reported with the same detector, it has been at the expense of resolution. 14,15 This has led to systems being designed either for MBS or TPD or having separate chambers for TPD and MBS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%