2020
DOI: 10.1080/17451000.2020.1846201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-related timing of the spring bloom and match between phytoplankton and zooplankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also suspect greater interference during summer blooms of cyanobacteria and minor contribution throughout the year as there are always small quantities of chlorophylls and phycocyanin of phytoplankton origin in the surface waters. The spring bloom duration in the Baltic Sea is about one and a half months (Groetsch et al, 2016) and the peak of the bloom in 2018 coincided with the end of the FerryBox experiment (Almén and Tamelander, 2020). Nevertheless, we did not see the signal enhancing effect of the phytoplankton during the FerryBox experiment, as the PAH signals should have increased toward the end of the testing period together with the bloom intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We can also suspect greater interference during summer blooms of cyanobacteria and minor contribution throughout the year as there are always small quantities of chlorophylls and phycocyanin of phytoplankton origin in the surface waters. The spring bloom duration in the Baltic Sea is about one and a half months (Groetsch et al, 2016) and the peak of the bloom in 2018 coincided with the end of the FerryBox experiment (Almén and Tamelander, 2020). Nevertheless, we did not see the signal enhancing effect of the phytoplankton during the FerryBox experiment, as the PAH signals should have increased toward the end of the testing period together with the bloom intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Accordingly, elevated seawater temperatures in spring have advanced the timing of the spring bloom in the study region (Wasmund et al . 2019 ), associated with a shorter lag between phyto- and zooplankton biomass peaks (Almén and Tamelander 2020 ). Although primary production generally increases with eutrophication, the negative effects later in the season override the positive feedback for the spring blooming species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study regions, phytoplankton responses to favorable growth conditions will occur within a time span of a day to a week. However, zooplankton blooms develop over longer and highly variable durations that can range from days to months depending on taxa, temperature, and species‐specific phenological patterns (Almén & Tamelander, 2020; Riegman et al., 1993). These lags can thus obscure relationships between plankton size spectra and other ecosystem metrics, particularly in cold regions with slow‐growing taxa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%