2022
DOI: 10.3390/insects13020139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature-Specific and Sex-Specific Fitness Effects of Sympatric Mitochondrial and Mito-Nuclear Variation in Drosophila obscura

Abstract: The adaptive significance of sympatric mitochondrial (mtDNA) variation and the role of selective mechanisms that maintain it are debated to this day. Isofemale lines of Drosophila obscura collected from four populations were backcrossed within populations to construct experimental lines, with all combinations of mtDNA Cyt b haplotypes and nuclear genetic backgrounds (nuDNA). Individuals of both sexes from these lines were then subjected to four fitness assays (desiccation resistance, developmental time, egg-to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, despite the growing body of evidence that shows standing genetic variation in the mitochondrial genome accumulates via natural selection [18,[22][23][24], studies continue to assume strict neutrality of mitochondrial gene sequences. A possible reason for this salient omission could be that the mitonuclear effect on phenotypes is mostly reported in conventional model organisms, like fruit flies and beetles [8,16,17,25]. So the generality of the mitonuclear genetic effects must be tested across different models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, despite the growing body of evidence that shows standing genetic variation in the mitochondrial genome accumulates via natural selection [18,[22][23][24], studies continue to assume strict neutrality of mitochondrial gene sequences. A possible reason for this salient omission could be that the mitonuclear effect on phenotypes is mostly reported in conventional model organisms, like fruit flies and beetles [8,16,17,25]. So the generality of the mitonuclear genetic effects must be tested across different models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, variation in mitonuclear effects on developmental time between females and males is generally modest or absent in Drosophila sp. (Jelić et al, 2015; Mossman et al, 2016a; Erić et al, 2022) despite sex-specific effects of mitochondrial genotype on many other fitness-related traits when evaluated on common nuclear genetic backgrounds (Camus et al, 2012; Kurbalija Novičić et al, 2015; Nagarajan-Radha et al, 2019, 2020; Carnegie et al, 2021). Taken together, these results and our findings for T. californicus suggest that effects of mitonuclear incompatibilities on developmental rate may often be inconsistent with the expectations of the ‘mother’s curse’ hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heritability of this trait variation among hybrid individuals is potentially another important factor determining if mitonuclear incompatibilities can create strong barriers for gene flow between populations, and to our knowledge, the transmission of incompatibilities across generations has not been directly assessed. Additionally, it is possible for the effects of mitonuclear incompatibilities to vary between females and males (Jelić et al, 2015, Mossman et al, 2016b; Đorđević et al, 2017; Hoekstra et al, 2018, Carnegie et al, 2021; Erić et al, 2022), which may be the result of genetic interactions involving sex determining loci (e.g., heterologous sex chromosomes; Lopez et al, 2021), or of the predominantly maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in metazoans (e.g., Giles et al, 1980). For example, the ‘mother’s curse’ hypothesis posits that mutations in mitochondrial DNA causing beneficial interactions in females will accumulate, even if they cause negative interactions in males, due to the lack of paternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA (Frank & Hurst, 1996; Gemmell et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, allelic variation in mitonuclear interactions contributes to human diseases [22][23][24][25][26]. Mitonuclear epistasis occurs within populations [27,28], between populations of the same species [15,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and between closely related species [17,36], suggesting that physiologically-relevant mitonuclear epistasis is ubiquitous in natural populations. Mitonuclear loci are clearly influencing phenotypes that shape the structure of natural populations and are important for understanding evolutionary and coevolutionary processes, including speciation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%