10th Aerodynamic Testing Conference 1978
DOI: 10.2514/6.1978-779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature step effects on direct measurement of skin-friction drag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This error becomes larger at low shear levels, i.e. high Mach numbers and/or low Reynolds numbers [42]. The temperature difference between the rubber RTV sheet and the sensor complex Finally, it is worth noting that the various measuring techniques used for comparison here predict skin friction to within ± 18%.…”
Section: Flight Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This error becomes larger at low shear levels, i.e. high Mach numbers and/or low Reynolds numbers [42]. The temperature difference between the rubber RTV sheet and the sensor complex Finally, it is worth noting that the various measuring techniques used for comparison here predict skin friction to within ± 18%.…”
Section: Flight Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Through iterations of past designs, sources of error have been identified, controlled, and minimized. These sources include gap-ratio effects, lip-ratio effects, floating element misalignment [6], step-temperature effects [15], pressure gradients [16], etc. Still, it is important to report the magnitudes of these errors, generally in the form of an overall uncertainty, so that a level of confidence may be placed on the measurement data.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was important to match the properties of the floating element to those of the surrounding engine wall as closely as possible, so as to prevent errors due to temperature mismatch between the floating element and the surrounding engine wall. Voisinet's 21 study showed that such a temperature mismatch could lead to significant errors in the measurement of skin friction. By providing a heat flow path as much like the rest of the engine wall as possible, this error can be minimized.…”
Section: General Design Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A schematic of his device is shown above in Figure 5. The work that followed, including that of Allen 19,20 , Voisinet 21 , and Roensch and Cadwell…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%